This Court has reviewed the evidence and must ask: did you, at ANY POINT during those thirty property tours, think to inquire about your client's relationship with single-digit integers? Judge Escrow finds this oversight UNCONSCIONABLE. The defendant claims the house number 2314 "adds up to seven" as if this is mathematics and not clearly a matter for the Interdimensional Bureau of Residential Vibrations, which this Court has contacted on MULTIPLE occasions regarding a fence dispute. You rearranged your children's SOCCER SCHEDULES for a woman who believes addresses are negotiable with municipal governments, and yet you failed to present her with a simple numerology waiver form? The Court notes that 1123 ALSO equals seven, which proves your client's psychic is either a fraud or playing an extraordinarily long game that frankly this Court respects. Your wine consumption is entered into evidence as Exhibit A in the case of Your Life Choices v. Basic Pattern Recognition. This Court needs a moment.