Advertisement
CONFESSION #0150 — LOWBALL OFFER
Friday, August 8, 2025
I just spent three hours writing up a comprehensive offer package for my buyers. Comps, market analysis, escalation clause, the works. They loved the house, they're pre-approved for well over asking, and the property has been sitting for 47 days with two price reductions. So what number do they want to come in at? Forty-two percent below list price. Forty-two. Their reasoning? "Well, the market is shifting, and we saw a TikTok that said you should always start low because sellers are desperate." I explained that this seller already dropped the price twice and is probably emotionally raw. I showed them the comps that prove even with negotiations, we should be within five percent of asking. I practically begged them to let me submit something that wouldn't get us laughed out of the room. Nope. They wanted to "see what happens." What happened is the listing agent texted me a single emoji. Just the one with the face laughing so hard it's crying. Then she stopped responding entirely. Now my buyers are offended that they got "disrespected" and want to find a new house. Starting the whole process over. I need a drink.
Advertisement
Judge Reginald Escrow III
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF AGGRAVATED TIKTOK-INDUCED OFFER MALPRACTICE
This Court has witnessed many crimes against the sacred institution of real estate negotiations, but FORTY-TWO PERCENT BELOW LIST based on algorithmic wisdom from a teenager dancing in front of a ring light represents a new low in human reasoning. The defendant-buyers have committed what Judge Escrow classifies as Terminal Main Character Syndrome, wherein they believed the market exists solely to accommodate their delusions while a pre-approved blessing gathered dust in their pocket. The listing agent's single crying-laughing emoji shall be entered into evidence as Exhibit A and frankly constitutes the most eloquent legal response this Court has ever reviewed. That the buyers now feel DISRESPECTED after submitting what amounts to a financial insult wrapped in a TikTok citation is the kind of irony that makes this Court question whether we are living in a simulation designed specifically to test judicial patience. The defendant-agent is hereby granted one drink, possibly two, and the Court's deepest sympathies for the fresh hell of starting over with clients who have learned absolutely nothing.
SCANDAL RATING: 7.4/10 Emoji Justice Served

Have a confession? Judge Reginald Escrow III's docket is always open.

Submit Anonymously → Subscribe to the Newsletter
Advertisement

← Back to the Full Docket