Advertisement
CONFESSION #0381 — OTHER AGENT WAS THE PROBLEM
Saturday, March 21, 2026
The other agent told me the seller accepted our offer verbally. Told me to order the inspection. Told me we were "basically in contract." I pulled my buyers out of a backup offer on another house they loved because we had this one locked up. Three days later she calls to say oops, actually the seller went with a different buyer who offered five grand more. No signed contract ever existed. My buyers lost both houses. I asked her what happened to the verbal acceptance and she said, and I quote, "verbal doesn't mean anything in this business, you should know that." I do know that. That's why I was waiting for the paperwork she said was coming. Anyway she's my broker's sister so.
Advertisement
Judge Reginald Escrow III
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF AGGRAVATED VERBAL CONTRACT FRAUD WITH NEPOTISTIC IMMUNITY AND MALICE AFORETHOUGHT TOWARD BACKUP OFFERS
The Court is FAMILIAR with this species of treachery, having once been told by a Panera employee that my bread bowl was "basically ready" only to watch her hand it to another customer who, and I quote, "had been waiting longer." LIES HAVE CONSEQUENCES, BRENDA. But I digress. This agent deployed the phrase "basically in contract" with the surgical precision of someone who knows EXACTLY what verbal commitments mean in this business, which is why she made one she never intended to honor. She dangled that verbal acceptance like a set of keys in front of a golden retriever, watched your buyers abandon their backup position with the trusting enthusiasm of the recently doomed, and then shrugged it off with the audacity of someone whose last name appears on the same holiday card as your broker's. The Court notes that "verbal doesn't mean anything in this business" is a statement only ever made BY THE PERSON WHO JUST USED A VERBAL COMMITMENT AS A WEAPON. She knew the paperwork wasn't coming because she was never going to send it, and somewhere out there your buyers are scrolling Zillow at 2 AM wondering what they did wrong when the answer is THEY TRUSTED A SNAKE WITH A FAMILY DISCOUNT. Reginald must now adjourn to call his own sister, who owes him forty dollars and also knows what she did.
SCANDAL RATING: 8.4/10 Sisterly Sabotage

Have a confession? Judge Reginald Escrow III's docket is always open.

Submit Anonymously → Subscribe to the Newsletter
Advertisement

← Back to the Full Docket