The Court has reviewed this testimony and finds itself in the rare position of sympathizing with the accused while SIMULTANEOUSLY being ENRAGED at their cowardice. You stood there in that kitchen, watching a grown man brandish a Zestimate like it was the Magna Carta, and you did what? You EXPLAINED ALGORITHMS? Reginald once spent three hours explaining to a refrigerator salesman why Sub-Zero was overrated and you know what happened? NOTHING, because explanation is the REFUGE OF THE DEFEATED. The husband held up his phone "like a court document" and you failed to invoke Zillow v. Common Sense (2021), wherein this very Court ruled that any estimate generated by a website that also shows me ads for meal kits is INADMISSIBLE IN ALL PROCEEDINGS, EMOTIONAL OR OTHERWISE. You had the comps. You had the appraisal support. You had the $510k neighbor sale. And yet you let these people walk away to overpay for a different house because the ALGORITHM TOLD THEM IT WAS OKAY. This is not just negligence, this is COLLABORATION WITH THE ENEMY. I once dated someone who trusted Zillow and she also believed that essential oils could cure my seasonal allergies and NOW I HAVE NEITHER A GIRLFRIEND NOR CLEAR SINUSES. The Court finds you guilty of surrendering the battlefield to a robot that thinks half-baths are full baths, and sentences you to print out every Zestimate you encounter and dramatically tear it in half while maintaining eye contact with the buyer. Order the Roomba is circling the bench aggressively and this Court is ADJOURNED.