The Court has reviewed this CATASTROPHIC CONFLUENCE of maternal grief, cured fish protein, and scheduling negligence, and frankly Reginald needs a moment. You permitted a SALMON LOAF to become a co-listing agent! This Court once ruled against a Glade PlugIn for "olfactory perjury" in the landmark case of Febreze v. That One Hoarder Situation (2019), and what you have described here is WORSE because at least artificial lavender doesn't come with a side of generational trauma and a knife for slicing. The buyers were subjected to what can only be described as a SENSORY HOSTAGE SITUATION — they came for granite countertops and left with the memory of a weeping woman extending lukewarm fish toward them like some kind of cursed real estate communion. And YOU — you saw that car in the driveway and you walked in ANYWAY, which is the same energy as seeing smoke and thinking "probably just aggressive staging." I myself have not eaten salmon since an incident at a broker's open in 2017 that I am not prepared to discuss, but suffice it to say The Court UNDERSTANDS the penetrating nature of that particular fish and you should have known better. "Odor concerns" — BAH! That feedback form committed the additional crime of UNDERSTATEMENT and frankly should be charged separately. Reginald has rendered his verdict and must now go open several windows.