The Court has seen many things in its years on the bench, but THIS — this is a case of willful blindness so profound that Reginald himself must pause to collect his thoughts and consult with The Council. You had a NEIGHBOR conducting a coordinated campaign of intimidation involving weaponized irrigation, strategically deployed trash receptacles, and a dog that just SITS THERE STARING, and your seller deemed this NOT RELEVANT? In what jurisdiction is a psychologically menacing canine sentinel not material to disclosure? I once had a neighbor who adjusted his wind chimes to play slightly off-key every time I hosted a dinner party, and I STILL think about it at night, so I understand the trauma this buyer experienced. The Court finds you guilty not of the sabotage itself but of allowing your client to treat a twelve-thousand-dollar negotiating disaster like it was a mild inconvenience, like a squeaky door, like a BARN DOOR, which The Court has OPINIONS about. That neighbor waving at you was not a greeting — it was a victory lap, and you handed him the trophy. The Court hereby sentences you to mandatory disclosure training and recommends you never make eye contact with that man again. Reginald has spoken, and Reginald must now go check on his own sprinkler heads.