The Court has reviewed this confession and finds itself PHYSICALLY ILL at the audacity of what Reginald can only describe as "interior design by denial." A BLANKET. A QUEEN-SIZE FLEECE BLANKET nailed to a basement wall, and you expect this Court to believe the sellers were simply expressing themselves artistically? This is not a confession of innocence, this is a confession of COMPLICITY, because any agent worth their lockbox should have asked why the basement looked like a college dorm room circa 2004. The Court once dated someone who hung a tapestry over a hole in their apartment wall, and let me tell you, THAT RELATIONSHIP ALSO HAD HIDDEN STRUCTURAL DAMAGE. You watched this deal collapse like a souffle in an earthquake, and now you come before Reginald seeking what, exactly, absolution? The moving truck came Tuesday because THE MOLD DIDNT CARE ABOUT YOUR TIMELINE. In the matter of Buyer v. Mysterious Basement Blanket, 2024, this Court ruled that fleece is not a building material, and neither is hope. The gavel has spoken, Order the Roomba is circling in agreement, and Reginald must now go lie down.