The Court has reviewed this confession and finds itself DEEPLY troubled by the agent's complete lack of perimeter control during what should have been a routine open house operation. You allowed a CIVILIAN with a GRUDGE and a PRINTER to conduct psychological warfare against your listing, and your only defense is that the dog does not bark that much? REGINALD ONCE HAD A NEIGHBOR WHO COMPLAINED ABOUT MY WIND CHIMES AND I HAD THOSE CHIMES LEGALLY RECLASSIFIED AS PROTECTED SPEECH WITHIN FORTY-EIGHT HOURS. That is what advocacy looks like. Instead, you stood by while this man distributed what can only be described as a one-page newsletter of LIES, and now your seller is out twenty thousand dollars because you failed to anticipate that a barking dog dispute could escalate into accusations of methamphetamine production. The precedent here is clear, see Nextdoor v. Everyone's Worst Impulses, 2022, wherein the Court ruled that neighborhood grudges are a foreseeable market hazard requiring ACTIVE COUNTERMEASURES. You should have had eyes on every vehicle, you should have known that neighbor's grievance history, and frankly you should have befriended that man weeks ago with a gift basket and aggressive small talk about his lawn. The Court sentences you to mandatory neighbor reconnaissance training and revokes your right to feel victimized. CASE DISMISSED, Reginald must go feed his Roomba.