The Court has reviewed this timeline with the same horrified fascination one reserves for watching a man try to parallel park for eleven minutes. Let Reginald be perfectly clear — when a buyer asks if the seller will ROTATE THE HOUSE, that is not a question, that is a psychiatric evaluation disguised as a text message. You showed this man SIX MORE HOUSES after he forfeited fifteen thousand dollars because a building had the audacity to face the wrong direction? The Court once refused to date someone because they hung their toilet paper the wrong way, so I understand commitment to principle, but I did not then spend the next three months asking them to dinner while inquiring about their bathroom fixtures. You have enabled a man whose feng shui consultant has veto power over five-figure financial decisions, and now you sit here calling his obsessive orientation questions GROWTH as if he is a therapy patient and not simply a compass with a pre-approval letter. This Court finds you guilty of mistaking chaos for clientele and sentences you to immediately block his number, though we both know you will not because somewhere deep inside you believe the seventh house will be different. THE COURT HAS SPOKEN AND MUST NOW CONSULT ITS OWN FENG SHUI ADVISOR ABOUT WHETHER THIS BENCH FACES THE CORRECT DIRECTION FOR RENDERING JUDGMENT.