Advertisement
CONFESSION #0526 — COMMISSION CATASTROPHE
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
The other agent emailed at 9pm. Night before closing. Subject line just says "issue" which is never good, and she's telling me her buyers are backing out because they found out the neighbor has chickens (which I didn't even know about, the seller never mentioned chickens, I walked that property six times and never heard a single chicken) and now they want their earnest money back and my seller is saying absolutely not, we're keeping the twelve thousand, and I'm sitting there realizing my commission on this was going to be around fourteen thousand dollars and now it's going to be zero or maybe negative because I already paid for the appraisal out of pocket as a favor (don't ask why I did that, I was being nice, the seller was going through a divorce and crying a lot) and the appraisal was eight hundred dollars and my broker is going to want his desk fee regardless and the chickens aren't even loud apparently, the buyer just doesn't like the concept of chickens, the idea of chickens existing nearby, and I drove out there today and the chickens are in a nice coop, they seem like calm chickens, and now everyone's threatening to sue everyone and I'm out here defending poultry to strangers
Advertisement
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF INVOLUNTARY POULTRY ADJACENCY AND RECKLESS COMMISSION EVAPORATION IN THE FIRST DEGREE
The Court has reviewed this confession and finds itself PHYSICALLY ILL at the sequence of events described herein. You walked that property SIX TIMES and heard nothing, which means either those chickens are running a sophisticated silence operation or you have the situational awareness of a decorative throw pillow. But let us be clear about the REAL crime here: you paid for someone else's appraisal out of pocket because they were crying. CRYING. Reginald once cried for eleven minutes after losing a bidding war on a vintage gavel and nobody paid for ANYTHING on his behalf. The buyer objects to the CONCEPT of chickens, the philosophical EXISTENCE of nearby fowl, and somehow YOU are the one defending calm poultry to strangers while your commission dissolves like an Alka-Seltzer tablet in the toilet of broken dreams. This Court cites the landmark decision in Henderson v. One Suspiciously Quiet Rooster, 2019, which established that an agent cannot be held liable for livestock they did not hear, smell, or witness performing any chicken-related activities. However, you ARE guilty of terminal niceness, a condition that has cost you approximately fourteen thousand dollars plus eight hundred dollars plus whatever dignity remained after you described these birds as seeming calm. The Court awards you nothing, demands the chickens be called as witnesses in the earnest money dispute, and announces that Reginald must now leave because this ruling has given him a migraine and he needs to go yell at his Roomba.
Conceptual Chicken Catastrophe
Have a confession? Judge Reginald Escrow III's docket is always open.
Advertisement