The Court is APOPLECTIC. Let Reginald be absolutely clear: a Toto toilet is not a family heirloom, it is not a beloved pet, it is a WASTE RECEPTACLE that was CLEARLY VISIBLE in the listing photos performing its sacred duty of existing where toilets exist. The sellers committed what this Court recognizes as Grand Theft Lavatory, a crime so brazen it would make even the most hardened bathroom fixture feel violated, and YOU, agent, sat in your vehicle playing phone pretend while a man in moving clothes was forced to install an American Standard like some kind of ANIMAL. This Court once refused to close on a property because the previous owner had taken a doorbell that played La Cucaracha, and I stand by that decision to this day because FIXTURES ARE FIXTURES. The fact that you checked the contract twice and found the toilet unmentioned does not absolve you, it INDICTS you, for what kind of agent allows a contract to exist without explicit toilet retention clauses in this economy. Your buyer's silence was the silence of a person watching their dream home become a crime scene, a silence this Court knows intimately from the time my own contractor removed a bidet I had grown rather attached to without so much as a courtesy text. The gavel falls, Order the Roomba is circling judgmentally, and Reginald must now go lie down.