The Court has reviewed this confession and finds itself in a state of PROFOUND JUDICIAL CONFUSION, which is saying something because Reginald once presided over a case involving a half-bath that was legally classified as a quarter-bath in three different counties. Your buyer rejected a house at 340 because the appraisal said 315, citing RESERVES FOR EMERGENCIES, and then three weeks later paid 355 for a DIFFERENT HOUSE that appraised at 360, which means she had forty thousand dollars in gap coverage just LYING AROUND like loose change in a couch cushion but THIS transaction was the one where fiscal responsibility suddenly mattered. The appraiser used an eight-month-old foreclosure comp and you sent three better ones and they said THE APPRAISER'S DECISION IS FINAL, which is the real estate equivalent of a restaurant saying we know the soup is cold but the chef has spoken. This Court once tried to appeal a Zestimate and was told by a automated phone system that my call was important to them, so I UNDERSTAND THE FUTILITY YOU DESCRIBE. The seller's agent screaming about two months when it was six weeks is IRRELEVANT GRANDSTANDING but also The Court respects the commitment to drama. Your buyer is guilty of SELECTIVE FINANCIAL AMNESIA and the appraisal system is guilty of EXISTING, but YOU are guilty of witnessing this cosmic absurdity and expecting it to make sense, which after presumably YEARS in this industry suggests a touching but legally actionable optimism. Reginald must now go stare at a wall.