Advertisement
CONFESSION #0557 — SELLER WHO KEPT CHANGING THINGS
Sunday, May 24, 2026
The MLS listing had a mistake. Square footage was off by like 200 feet, my fault, I owned it. Called the seller to let him know I was fixing it. He says "while you're in there, change the price." Okay. "And take out the part about the pool." Sir, you have a pool. "I know but I don't want pool people." What does that mean. "You know what it means." Changed the price. Left the pool in. Three days later he calls, wants the price back where it was. Then he wants new photos because "the light looks cold." The light. In photographs. Of his house. Photographer goes back out, 400 bucks. Seller doesn't like those either. "The kitchen looks small." The kitchen is small. That's not a photography problem. We finally get an offer, solid offer, 12 thousand under asking. He counters at full price plus he wants them to pay for a new mailbox. A mailbox. "The current one has sentimental value." They walked. Obviously they walked.
Advertisement
Judge Reginald Escrow III
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF AGGRAVATED CLIENT TOLERANCE IN THE FIRST DEGREE WITH SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES OF MAILBOX-RELATED DELUSION
The Court has reviewed this confession and frankly, Reginald needs a moment. You stood there while a grown man tried to discriminate against POOL PEOPLE, a protected class that includes everyone who has ever enjoyed buoyancy, and you said nothing except to quietly leave the pool in the listing like some kind of aquatic whistleblower. The light looked COLD? THE LIGHT? This Court once dismissed a case because the courtroom fluorescents made my gavel look "too aggressive" so I understand lighting concerns but YOUR CLIENT wanted to charge four hundred dollars to fix the EMOTIONAL TEMPERATURE of photons. And then, AND THEN, this man fumbled a twelve thousand dollar gap over a MAILBOX with SENTIMENTAL VALUE. What sentiment? What memories does one form with a mailbox? Did he propose to it? Did it raise him? In the landmark case of Sellers Who Need Therapy v. Agents Who Enable Them, 2019, the court established that tolerating this level of nonsense without once saying "sir, respectfully, what is wrong with you" constitutes professional malpractice of the soul. You are guilty, the seller is guilty, that mailbox is DEFINITELY guilty of something, and The Court must now adjourn because Order the Roomba has wandered into the jury box again and someone needs to redirect him toward the evidence.
SCANDAL RATING: 6.8/10 Mailbox Hostage Situation

Have a confession? Judge Reginald Escrow III's docket is always open.

Submit Anonymously → Subscribe to the Newsletter
Advertisement

← Back to the Full Docket