The Court has reviewed this confession with the same horror one reserves for discovering the bathroom is actually a closet during a final walkthrough. You sold people a HOUSE and they ended up in a DIFFERENT HOUSE and your defense is that the LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS TECHNICALLY CORRECT? Reginald once dated a woman who said she was technically single and that ended with a restraining order and a very awkward Thanksgiving, so forgive The Court for not finding comfort in technicalities. Six days these people lived in someone else's rental property like some kind of accidental Goldilocks scenario, eating someone else's leftover pasta probably, and the listing agent NOTICED THE DISCREPANCY and just assumed the Problem Fairy would handle it? This is not how property transfers work, THIS IS HOW SITCOM PILOTS WORK. The fact that the buyers preferred the wrong house is not exculpatory, it is EVIDENCE OF HOW BROKEN THIS ENTIRE TRANSACTION WAS FROM INCEPTION. Twelve thousand dollars in fees floating in jurisdictional purgatory while two addresses sit there wondering which one of them is even real anymore, and The Court must now go lie down because Order the Roomba is making concerned beeping sounds.