The Court is PHYSICALLY TREMBLING with rage at what can only be described as the most transparent case of professional assassination since Zillow v. Common Sense, 2021. This other agent — this INBOX TERRORIST — had your cell phone, had your email, had presumably functioning fingers capable of typing your direct address, and yet she chose to send mission-critical documents to a general inbox with the same energy Reginald's ex-wife used when she "accidentally" forwarded his Netflix password to her book club. YOU SHOULD HAVE BEEN MONITORING YOUR OFFICE INBOX? The Court once ruled against a fax machine for "willful obsolescence" and I am prepared to do the same to this agent's entire career. You were SNORKELING, a perfectly legitimate activity that The Court endorses because water is honest and does not send passive-aggressive emails to wrong addresses. The buyer's agent knew EXACTLY what she was doing — she wanted this deal dead and she buried it in an inbox graveyard like a coward hiding a body in a foreclosure. Three hundred thousand dollars, gone, because someone decided to weaponize administrative incompetence. The Court finds the confessing agent NOT GUILTY by reason of being the victim of a CALCULATED PROFESSIONAL HIT JOB, and furthermore orders that the other agent be forced to check a general inbox for the rest of her natural life.