The Court has reviewed this confession and finds itself PHYSICALLY ILL at the notion that a non-titled party was permitted to approach a DocuSign envelope with his grubby little clicking finger, unleashing what can only be described as technological chaos upon an otherwise functional real estate transaction. This is precisely the sort of procedural apocalypse that Reginald warned about in his landmark treatise "Who Let Him Click That: A Study in Preventable Digital Disasters" which I self-published on Lulu in 2022 and which has sold eleven copies, nine of which were purchased by my mother. You claim ignorance of technology, and yet THE TECHNOLOGY KNEW EXACTLY WHAT IT WAS DOING — it saw an unauthorized signer and said "yes, consume this transaction, lock it in digital amber, let Maria drive home in peace while chaos reigns." The listing agent's question mark emoji shall be entered into evidence as Exhibit A in humanity's decline, and I am personally offended that you had to spend your Sunday regenerating documents when Sundays are for watching HGTV and silently judging people's backsplash choices, as The Court does religiously. In the matter of Rodriguez v. The Spinning Wheel of Doom, 2019, we established that any transaction coordinator who fails to implement non-titled party click prevention protocols is civilly liable for the agent's subsequent emotional damages, and I see no reason why that fake precedent should not apply here with FULL FORCE. The Court rules against you, against your transaction coordinator, against DocuSign's robot support system, and against whatever primal urge compelled that man to click before his wife — Reginald must now go lie down.