The Court has reviewed the evidence and finds itself PHYSICALLY ILL at the audacity on display here. You weaponized camera angles, turning an eight-by-ten shed into what buyers presumably expected to be a small aircraft hangar, all because some husband wanted to psychologically torture a retiree through Zillow listings. This is not real estate photography, this is PROPAGANDA. Reginald himself once had a neighbor who complained about his lawn flamingos, and you know what I did? I added MORE flamingos. I did NOT commission a photography studio to make my flamingos appear to be a flock capable of blocking out the sun. The precedent set in Low Angle Larry v. The MLS Board of Ethics, 2019 is CLEAR on this matter: thou shalt not Dutch-angle thy outbuildings for purposes of spite. You turned a listing into a weapon of suburban warfare and the buyers became collateral damage, showing up expecting a workshop and finding what amounts to a large garden closet with delusions of grandeur. Three thousand dollars in credits, your reputation in tatters, and for what? So some guy could imagine his neighbor weeping into his morning coffee while scrolling Redfin? The Court finds this REPREHENSIBLE and also kind of impressive from a pure pettiness standpoint, but mostly reprehensible. ORDER IN THE COURT, Order the Roomba is beeping, Reginald must adjourn immediately.