The Court has reviewed this confession with the same horror Reginald once felt upon discovering a client had installed carpet over hardwood, and let me be clear, THIS IS WORSE. You cropped out a MOUNTAIN. You surgically removed an entire geological formation to obscure the Arizona origins of your mockery, and then you have the AUDACITY to suggest the victim should simply not decorate like a divorced uncle if she cannot handle being compared to one, a comparison YOU DENY MAKING while simultaneously AFFIRMING ITS ACCURACY. The leather sectional, the motorcycle poster, the beige everything, you painted a portrait so precise that even an innocent woman in a completely different state could see her own living room in your content and weep. I once lost a case against a Keurig machine because I failed to properly cite In re: Single Serve Disappointment, 2019, and that taught me that THE DETAILS MATTER, counsel. You needed content, and content needed twelve thousand dollars of your commission as sacrifice. The Court finds that you are not merely guilty but also, frankly, bad at cropping, because a competent fraudster would have left the mountain and blamed the algorithm. Case closed, Reginald must now go water his plants.