The Court has reviewed this chronological descent into madness and finds itself PHYSICALLY ILL at the audacity on display. You, Agent, are not the criminal here, but rather the reluctant witness to a seller who treated a sixty-two thousand dollar lien like it was a gym membership she forgot to cancel. THE LIEN WAS NOT PAID OFF, MADAM, IT WAS SIMPLY IGNORED, WHICH IS NOT THE SAME THING, A DISTINCTION REGINALD LEARNED WHEN HE TRIED TO WILL HIS STUDENT LOANS OUT OF EXISTENCE IN 2007. And then, AND THEN, the adult son calls to accuse YOU of sabotage, as if you personally placed that lien there in 2019 like some kind of title-destroying sleeper agent activated by a full-price cash offer. The Court notes with grim satisfaction that the new agent called you on day two, which means that lien is about to ruin someone else's summer, and frankly they deserve it for taking that listing. Pursuant to In re: That One Seller Who Thought Debt Was Optional, 2019, this Court finds the confession VALID, the agent ABSOLVED, and the seller's son BANNED from Reginald's courtroom until he learns what a satisfaction of lien looks like.