The Court has reviewed this confession and must pause to acknowledge that Reginald himself once paid a life coach named Derek $275 a month to help him "unlock his judicial potential," and Derek's advice for handling a difficult ruling was to "ask yourself what the verdict would feel like if it already existed," which is NOT HOW VERDICTS WORK, DEREK. This agent stands before The Court having hemorrhaged eight thousand dollars in commission while a man on Zoom spoke in what can only be described as a fortune cookie having a stroke. "What would the version of you who's already closed this deal do" is not coaching, it is LINGUISTIC MONEY LAUNDERING. The Court finds it particularly ENRAGING that when confronted with his own uselessness, this so-called coach pivoted to "let's talk about what you're making this mean," which is the verbal equivalent of a smoke bomb thrown by a man who charges monthly for the privilege of being confused AT you. You did not lose this deal because of a square footage discrepancy, you lost it because you were taking tactical advice from someone whose business model requires your perpetual uncertainty. The Court hereby sentences this "coach" to actually answer one direct question, though we all know he will instead ask what that sentence is bringing up for him. CASE DISMISSED, Reginald must now go cancel a subscription.