The Court has reviewed this confession and finds itself PHYSICALLY ILL at the sequence of events described herein. You stood there, Agent, and watched a man whose primary qualification is "owns a trailer with hoses" attempt to combat a fungal infestation with what can only be described as aggressive moisture application. This is not remediation, this is BIOLOGICAL WARFARE AGAINST THE FOUNDATION. The Court once had a brother-in-law who claimed he could "handle" a termite situation with a shop vac and positive thinking, and Reginald's screened porch has never recovered, so I UNDERSTAND the family dynamics at play here, but understanding is not exoneration. You documented this disaster with the precision of a nature documentary filmmaker watching a gazelle get eaten, and while your liability warnings were legally sound, you failed to physically restrain anyone from introducing MORE WATER to a WATER-DAMAGED BASEMENT. The fact that this walking disclosure violation then listed with your competitor is not your tragedy, it is your GIFT, because when that buyer's inspector finds what is now essentially a mushroom terrarium with load-bearing walls, you will be sipping coffee from a safe legal distance. The Court assigns you a scandal rating of 6.4, not for wrongdoing but for being cursed to witness stupidity of this magnitude without a drink in hand. Case dismissed, Reginald must now go yell at his Roomba about something unrelated.