The Court has reviewed this confession and must now address the accused directly: you come before Reginald seeking absolution, but what you have actually done is WITNESS A CRIME AND THEN APOLOGIZE FOR NOTICING IT. The listing agent claims she did not know about a receipt located in a drawer she physically opened, which is the real estate equivalent of claiming you did not see the sun because you were too busy squinting. This Court once ruled against a ShowingTime notification for being passive-aggressive, so do not think for ONE MOMENT that Reginald will not also rule against you for your complicity in this drawer-based farce. Your broker wants middle ground between a lie and not a lie, and I must inform you that this middle ground is called PERJURY ADJACENT and it is where careers go to decompose quietly. The Court notes with CONSIDERABLE IRRITATION that you have calculated your hourly wage, which means you are already mentally preparing to accept this injustice, and frankly that kind of self-aware defeat reminds me of my third law school, which also asked me to accept less than I deserved. You should have photographed that receipt, forwarded it to the state licensing board, and then walked directly into the ocean for ever thinking middle ground was a place worth standing. THIS COURT FINDS YOU GUILTY of being too reasonable in the face of unreasonable people, and sentences you to file that ethics complaint you have been drafting in your head since paragraph two. Reginald has spoken and must now attend to a separate matter involving a garage that was described as detached but was in fact simply lonely.