The Court is PHYSICALLY ILL at what has been presented here today. You walked a property SIX TIMES and never once ventured behind a hedge? Reginald once discovered a functioning speakeasy behind an overgrown boxwood in Scottsdale, and he was there for a SHOWING, not a so-called professional inspection. This Court cites the landmark decision in Shrubbery v. Due Diligence, 2019, wherein it was established that "if foliage obscures it, thou must still observe it." And now your client weeps, WEEPS, while you "look into it" like a man staring at a refrigerator hoping dinner will announce itself. The phrase "learning experience" is what brokers say when they mean "you are on your own and I am going to pretend this conversation never happened," and frankly The Court is having flashbacks to when my own mentor said that after I accidentally notarized a placemat at Applebee's, but THAT IS NOT THE POINT. You had ONE JOB, which was to walk the ENTIRE property, including the parts that required minor physical effort, and instead you let a rogue shed and a $24,000 fine lurk in botanical darkness like a financial predator. The Court finds you guilty and orders you to immediately purchase a machete, a surveyor's vest, and whatever remains of your professional dignity. VERDICT RENDERED, The Court must now go argue with a hedge of its own.