The Court has reviewed this confession and finds itself PHYSICALLY ILL at the phrase "define flooded." Reginald once had a client ask him to define "mold" and I had to excuse myself to scream into a decorative pillow for eleven minutes. This seller held an entire transaction hostage over a Ring doorbell — a SURVEILLANCE DEVICE that probably captured footage of seventeen delivery drivers and one raccoon — because of PRINCIPLE. Let the record show that "principle" is Latin for "I am difficult and everyone in my life knows it." The basement flooding question alone warrants a mistrial of this woman's entire personality. Eight months on market, three price reductions, and she still had the AUDACITY to leave a two-star review as if YOU were the problem, as if YOU personally installed that doorbell with malicious intent. The Court finds it telling that the buyer eventually surrendered, which means this seller now owns a doorbell that witnessed her own moral bankruptcy. You advocated plenty, and that IS the whole problem, because advocacy for the unreasonable is a punishment unto itself, as established in Zillow v. Common Sense, 2021. The Court sentences this seller to eternal escrow and awards you full custody of your own sanity. ORDER THE ROOMBA HAS BEGUN CIRCLING THE BENCH WHICH MEANS REGINALD MUST NOW ADJOURN.