The Court is APOPLECTIC. This seller has committed what can only be described as a constitutional crisis of the residential variety, ceding veto power over a twelve-thousand-dollar-over-asking offer to a creature that eats its own vomit and considers a tennis ball a worthy adversary. A YAWN. The dog YAWNED. Reginald has reviewed the seminal case of Barksworth v. Reasonable Human Judgment, 2019, and the precedent is CLEAR: drowsy canine behavior does not constitute grounds for contract rejection. The Court must pause here to note that my own mother once refused to sell her Buick to a man because her cat hissed at his shoes, and I have not spoken to her since Thanksgiving of 2017, so perhaps Reginald takes this personally. Your buyer wept in your vehicle for twenty minutes while a golden retriever with NO real estate license, NO E&O insurance, and NO understanding of comparable sales data was permitted to torpedo a transaction. The seller then watched forty thousand dollars evaporate into the ether waiting for some mythical dog-approved purchaser, proving once again that humanity remains unworthy of homeownership. The Court hereby declares this the most egregious miscarriage of transactional justice since that time a seller rejected an offer because Mercury was in retrograde, and Reginald must now go lie down.