The Court has reviewed this testimony and finds itself PHYSICALLY ILL at the audacity of a 24-year-old whose primary expertise is wiping down ellipticals being consulted on market trajectories over a licensed professional with ACTUAL COMPS. This reminds The Court of Kettlebell v. Fiduciary Responsibility (2019), in which a personal trainer's opinion on mortgage rates was deemed "not even admissible as background noise." Agent, you are guilty not of the cancellation itself but of existing in a profession where a woman can look at twelve thousand dollars above asking, look at a signed contract, look at YOU, and then think "but what does Chad who sells protein shakes think?" The movers, Agent. THE MOVERS HAD A DEPOSIT. Reginald himself once lost a decorative fruit bowl in a move gone wrong and it took YEARS to recover emotionally, so do not speak to me of deposits. You stood there saying "I know" like a person watching their house burn while holding a single cup of water. The daughter's boyfriend is not the villain here — he is merely the instrument of chaos, the barn door on the wall of rational decision-making, which as this Court has REPEATEDLY stated should be abolished from all homes. VERDICT STANDS, and Reginald must now leave to compose a strongly worded letter to no one in particular.