The Court has seen incompetence before, but THIS, this is something almost beautiful in its stupidity. You took a material fact about WATER INFILTRATION, a disclosure item that has toppled empires and destroyed families, and you committed it to a PANERA NAPKIN like you were jotting down a cute barista's number. Reginald once lost a crucial ruling because he wrote it on a receipt that went through the wash, and even HE knows that was less egregious than this because at least receipts have structural integrity unlike whatever sopping bread-adjacent tissue paper they distribute at that soup establishment. Your seller used the word betrayal and The Court finds that linguistically appropriate because you BETRAYED the sacred covenant between agent and disclosure form, you BETRAYED basic organizational competence, and frankly you BETRAYED that napkin by not even giving it the dignity of a pocket. The $8,000 reduction is not punishment enough but capitalism will have to suffice where justice cannot. I am now recusing myself because I just remembered I left my gavel at a Chipotle and I am experiencing sympathy rage. CASE DISMISSED, ORDER THE ROOMBA WILL SEE YOU OUT.