The Court has reviewed this testimony and finds itself in a state of PROFOUND DISTRESS, not about the commission dispute, which is frankly pedestrian, but about the couch situation which represents a COMPLETE BREAKDOWN OF SOCIETAL ORDER. You drove by her house to confirm your couch's location in her garage, and Reginald must ask: did you slow down, or did you do the full creep past at four miles per hour like a rejected prom date, because The Court has done both and needs to know for PURELY LEGAL REASONS. The divorce attorney citing internet articles about post-closing commission negotiations is grounds for disbarment in at least three jurisdictions I just invented, see Reynolds v. That Guy Who Reads Too Much Zillow Forum, 2019, a landmark case I ruled on from my breakfast nook. HOWEVER, the fact that you logged nineteen visits with mileage because your accountant told you to suggests a level of administrative compliance that The Court finds both admirable and deeply concerning, pick a lane, either be chaotic or be organized, this middle ground is UNACCEPTABLE. You staged her home with your own furniture and she kept it, which means you essentially furnished her post-divorce life, congratulations you are now spiritually her interior designer and possibly owe her a throw pillow consultation. The Court rules that you must retrieve that couch by any means necessary, and if the brokerage wants you to take an eight thousand dollar settlement they can ALSO replace the couch, The Council of Gavels has spoken and frankly Reginald needs to lie down.