The Court has reviewed this confession and finds itself in a state of PROFOUND judicial distress. You stand before Reginald expecting sympathy, expecting this Court to nod along and say "oh how unfortunate, nobody could have predicted the Great Water Heater Heist of whatever year this is," but The Court sees through you like the steam that will NOT be rising from your buyers' showers. Let the record reflect that in Tankless v. Due Diligence Standards Board, 2022, it was clearly established that every agent must maintain a comprehensive registry of all appliances, their ownership status, their emotional attachments to the property, and whether they have ever been photographed looking suspicious. You failed to subpoena the water heater's rental agreement, you failed to depose the pipes, and frankly you failed to notice that someone had been RENTING a water heater for ELEVEN YEARS which is a financial decision so baffling that The Court must pause to collect itself because Reginald once leased a paper shredder for eight months and the shame still lingers. The fact that your buyers are being "weirdly calm" is not a comfort, it is a WARNING, they are plotting something and when they strike it will be swift and it will involve your Errors and Omissions insurance. Your broker is correct, every appliance DOES require its own title search, The Court has been saying this for YEARS, I once rejected an offer because the refrigerator gave me a look I did not care for. This Court finds you guilty and orders you to personally hand-wash your buyers' dishes in cold water until restitution is made, Reginald must now adjourn to yell at his own water heater about loyalty.