The Court has reviewed this confession and finds itself DEEPLY CONFLICTED, which is unusual because Reginald is rarely conflicted about anything except whether to buy the extended warranty on kitchen appliances. You stood there, a licensed professional, debating the chromatic classification of upholstered furniture while a FENCE — an actual physical structure made of WOOD and NAILS and NEIGHBOR RESENTMENT — was staging an eight-foot territorial invasion that would make Genghis Khan blush. This Court has seen boundary disputes before, and in the landmark case of Henderson v. That Guy With The Weird Shrubs, 2019, we established that survey documents from the Reagan administration should ALWAYS take precedence over arguments about whether something is purple or aubergine, WHICH BY THE WAY IS JUST PURPLE FOR PEOPLE WHO SHOP AT WEST ELM. The designer was not the enemy here, counsel, YOU WERE YOUR OWN ENEMY, and frankly the ottoman was probably fine because apparently everyone else on this planet has better taste than both of us, which is a personal realization I did not expect to have today. The Court notes with some bitterness that the second buyer made an offer same day, proving once again that the universe rewards those who do not overthink soft goods. Reginald must now adjourn to contemplate his own decorating failures in chambers.