The Court has reviewed this confession and finds itself in the unusual position of directing its righteous fury not at the agent, but at the PARASITIC BASEMENT DWELLER who has weaponized social media against a professional who DID NOTHING WRONG. Let the record show that this agent represented the BUYER, disclosed the DISCLOSED disclosure, obtained a SIGNED ACKNOWLEDGMENT on PAGE EIGHT, and still somehow became the villain in a Facebook soap opera starring a 25-year-old man whose primary life skill appears to be generating engagement metrics from his childhood bedroom. Reginald himself once had a nephew who posted a negative Yelp review of Thanksgiving dinner and that nephew is NO LONGER INVITED TO HOLIDAYS, which is the appropriate familial response when your spawn commits reputational arson. The mother, bless her conflict-avoidant heart, left a five-star review while simultaneously allowing her son to conduct what can only be described as a one-man digital insurgency against basic fairness, and The Court must ask: WHAT IS PROTECTIVE ABOUT BEING OBJECTIVELY WRONG IN A PUBLIC FORUM WITH 200 SHARES? Three thousand dollars to remediate disclosed wiring versus an agent's entire searchable reputation, and this alleged adult needs TIME TO THINK ABOUT IT? The Court hereby rules the agent NOT GUILTY of any professional misconduct and sentences the son to six months of mandatory employment followed by a public apology written in complete sentences, and Reginald must now adjourn because this level of injustice has given him heartburn.