Advertisement
CONFESSION #0901 — GURU OR COACH NONSENSE
Friday, September 25, 2026
He wasn't on the title. The guru, I mean, the guy who charged me twelve hundred dollars for his "inner circle mastermind" which was really just a Facebook group where he posted motivational quotes at 6am and occasionally went live to talk about abundance (not the word but the concept, like how money flows to people who deserve it or whatever), he wasn't even on the title of the house he kept using in his marketing materials, the one with the pool and the view that was supposed to prove his system worked. His wife owned it. Found that out because I ran a quick search after he told us during a coaching call that we needed to "invest in assets that work for you" and I thought wait, let me see what this guy actually owns. Nothing. He owns nothing. His LLC has his course and that's it. And I sat through eight weeks of him telling me my problem was I didn't believe in myself enough when actually my problem was the market and also that I paid twelve hundred dollars to a man who rents.
Advertisement
Judge Reginald Escrow III
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF AGGRAVATED GURU GULLIBILITY IN THE SECOND DEGREE WITH CONTRIBUTING CIRCUMSTANCES OF FACEBOOK-BASED FINANCIAL MALPRACTICE
The Court has reviewed this confession and must pause to collect itself because THIS IS EXACTLY WHY REGINALD HAS TRUST ISSUES. You paid twelve hundred American dollars to a man whose entire real estate portfolio consists of motivational quotes and the AUDACITY to go live at 6am talking about abundance while his wife's name sits alone on that deed like a monument to your poor judgment. The Court finds it deeply troubling that you sat through EIGHT WEEKS of being told your problem was belief when your actual problem was arithmetic, specifically the part where twelve hundred dollars left your account and entered the pockets of a man who, and I cannot stress this enough, RENTS. I myself once attended a seminar titled "Unlock Your Escrow Potential" and the only thing I unlocked was a parking validation and a profound sense of betrayal, so The Court understands the seduction of a pool photograph. However, pursuant to the landmark decision in Facebook Mastermind Holdings v. Anyone With Google, 2022, the failure to conduct a basic title search BEFORE payment constitutes contributory negligence of the highest order. You did eventually run that search, which shows promise, but Reginald must note that closing the barn door after the horse has absconded with your twelve hundred dollars is not the victory you think it is. The gavel has spoken and Order the Roomba is circling in what I can only interpret as agreement.
SCANDAL RATING: 6.3/10 Abundance Fraud Victim

Have a confession? Judge Reginald Escrow III's docket is always open.

Submit Anonymously → Subscribe to the Newsletter
Advertisement

← Back to the Full Docket