The Court has reviewed this testimony and must now lie down on the floor of its chambers for several minutes. Let Reginald be ABSOLUTELY CLEAR: a seller rejected TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS of actual human currency because a WEBSITE told them their house was worth less, and they interpreted this as evidence of BUYER TREACHERY rather than evidence that ZILLOW IS A COMPUTER PROGRAM THAT HAS NEVER ONCE TOUCHED A WATER HEATER. This is like refusing a marriage proposal because your horoscope app said Mercury was in retrograde. The Court once lost a bidding war on a 1987 Ford Taurus because the seller's nephew said the Kelley Blue Book value was lower and therefore I must be planning to use it for crimes, so I UNDERSTAND THIS PAIN DEEPLY. Your buyer offered real money, waived inspection like a MANIAC, and lost to someone who apparently won by being less generous, which is a sentence The Court never thought it would have to type with its own gavel-calloused hands. The seller's agent should be required to take a continuing education course taught exclusively by that finished basement, and the Zestimate should be hauled before this Court as a hostile witness, though it will not appear because it is NOT REAL. Case closed, The Court must now go argue with its Roomba about jurisdiction.