The Court has reviewed this confession with the same mixture of horror and fascination Reginald reserves for homes where the sellers painted the brick. Let us be ABSOLUTELY CLEAR about what occurred here: your buyer essentially walked into a financial transaction with an active lawsuit tucked under his arm like a folded newspaper and thought NOBODY WOULD NOTICE. This is the real estate equivalent of showing up to a job interview while wearing your current employer's uniform and expecting a positive outcome. The audacity of "it's not like they're gonna win" as a disclosure strategy is so breathtaking that The Court must pause to collect itself, because I once had a client tell me the same thing about a boundary dispute and NOW I HAVE THREE FEWER FRIENDS AND A RESTRAINING ORDER FROM A SURVEYOR NAMED GLEN. As for the buyer requesting attorney recommendations, this falls under what legal scholars call "absolutely not, sir" per Johnson v. The Very Nerve Of You, 2019. The seller's agent who will not speak to you is engaging in what we call MISPLACED THEATRICAL FURY and frankly needs to redirect that energy toward the person who was LITERALLY BEING SUED WHILE UNDER CONTRACT. The Court finds you guilty only of being present during someone else's catastrophic life choices, and now Reginald must go lie down because this case has reminded him of several things he was actively suppressing.