The Court is DISTURBED, not merely by the staging catastrophe you witnessed, but by your apparent belief that standing there watching a woman bruise her hip constitutes professional conduct. You saw three HomeGoods price tags — THREE — dangling like little beacons of incompetence, and you said nothing in the moment. You watched an ottoman BLOCKADE a fireplace, which Reginald considers a crime against both architecture and the fundamental human right to know where fire goes, and you simply guided your clients through this furniture obstacle course like some kind of haunted IKEA sherpa. The listing agent's defense that "the stager's new" is inadmissible hearsay and also ENRAGES me personally because I once hired a new contractor who installed my bathroom door to swing outward into the hallway and when I complained he said he was "still learning doors" and I have not recovered. Furthermore, the Court finds the 600 square foot discrepancy to be a mathematical hate crime — that is TWENTY-FIVE PERCENT of a home that simply did not exist, yet was stuffed with enough furniture to fill the phantom footage anyway, creating what legal scholars call a "spatial paradox of aggressive denial." You are not the primary offender here, but you ARE a witness who failed to document the ottoman's fireplace sedition, and The Court does not forgive passive observation of staging war crimes. This ruling stands, the hip bruise is entered into evidence, and Reginald must now go shout at his own furniture.