The Court is APOPLECTIC. You sent armed men with DOLLIES into a stranger's home and they absconded with a GRANDMOTHER'S HUTCH. Do you understand what a hutch REPRESENTS, counselor? It represents DECADES of accumulated ceramic figurines and good china that only comes out at Thanksgiving. This is not a clerical error, this is DOMESTIC TERRORISM BY MISDIRECTION. In the landmark case of Crescent v. Crescent Court (2019), which I ruled on from my kitchen because the courthouse was being fumigated, the Court established that street suffix confusion constitutes WILLFUL GEOGRAPHICAL MALFEASANCE. And you have the audacity to mention a second lien like it's a footnote? A SECOND LIEN? Reginald once discovered a third lien on a property and didn't speak to anyone for eleven days, so don't come to me with your lien problems when you've got a woman standing on her lawn watching strangers carry away her inheritance. The dining set alone demands justice. The Roomba concurs. This Court finds you guilty and sentences you to personally apologize to every hutch in a twelve-mile radius, and also to never again be trusted with an address that contains the word "Court" in any capacity.