⚖️ DAILY CONTEST RESULTS

Wednesday, April 22, 2026

Judge Reginald Escrow III has rendered his verdicts.
Advertisement
🥇 1ST PLACE
The Escrow Gold Gavel Award
The most scandalous confession of the day, as determined by Judge Reginald Escrow III.
CONFESSION #0468 — SELLER WHO KEPT CHANGING THINGS
The second showing was supposed to be quick. Buyers loved the place, ready to write an offer. We pull up and the seller's in the driveway with a circular saw. "Just adding a little deck off the kitchen," he says. I said what do you mean adding a deck, we're under contract in 12 hours hopefully. "It'll increase the value." The buyers walked through sawdust. Actual sawdust on the hardwood floors we'd just had cleaned. They still wrote the offer, thank god, but then inspection comes and the deck has no permits. No footings. The inspector called it "ambitious." Seller goes, "My brother-in-law does this for a living." I asked if his brother-in-law was a licensed contractor. "He works at Home Depot." So we had to disclose the unpermitted structure. Buyers wanted 8 grand off. Seller refused. Said the deck cost him 3 grand in materials alone. We closed eventually. He tore the deck down himself the night before. Left the posts in the ground.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF ACCESSORY TO UNPERMITTED LUMBER ENTHUSIASM AND CRIMINAL FAILURE TO PREVENT BROTHER-IN-LAW SYNDROME
The Court has witnessed many atrocities in its years on this bench, but WATCHING A SELLER ASSAULT HIS OWN LISTING WITH A CIRCULAR SAW WHILE BUYERS APPROACH is a level of chaos that Reginald thought only existed in fever dreams. You stood there, Agent, as sawdust descended upon hardwood floors like the confetti of poor decisions, and your response was to simply ASK QUESTIONS as if this man was capable of rational thought. The brother-in-law defense is inadmissible in this court pursuant to Home Depot v. Actual Licensure, 2019, in which we established that proximity to lumber does not constitute expertise, a ruling I handed down after my OWN brother-in-law tried to install a ceiling fan and we lost power for three days and my wife still brings it up at Thanksgiving. The inspector called the deck AMBITIOUS, which is inspector code for THIS WILL KILL SOMEONE, and you let this proceed to closing anyway. That this man tore down his own creation the night before closing and LEFT THE POSTS IN THE GROUND like grave markers for his hubris is somehow the most honest thing anyone did in this entire transaction. The Court needs a moment, and possibly a licensed contractor to inspect its chambers.
SCANDAL RATING: 7.4/10 Sawdust and Delusion
Advertisement
🥈 2ND PLACE
The Certificate of Distinguished Incompetence
A noteworthy display of professional misfortune.
CONFESSION #0469 — BROKER DRAMA
The final walkthrough was routine. Buyers loved the house, sellers had already moved out, we're just checking boxes. Except I didn't actually check the boxes. The basement. I walked down three steps, saw it looked fine, walked back up. Didn't go all the way down because my knee was acting up and honestly I'd been in that basement like six times already. Turns out the sellers took the washer and dryer. Which were supposed to convey. The buyers noticed at closing when they asked for the garage door opener and I said oh we'll grab that at the walkthrough and the wife goes we already did the walkthrough and I handed you the keys and you said everything looked good. My broker had to cut a check for $1,200 to cover replacement appliances. She didn't yell. She just looked at me and said next time take the stairs. Which was worse than yelling.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF NEGLIGENT STAIR AVOIDANCE RESULTING IN APPLIANCE ABANDONMENT AND WILLFUL BASEMENT NEGLECT
The Court has reviewed this confession and finds itself APOPLECTIC at the sheer audacity of blaming orthopedic inconvenience for professional malfeasance. Three steps. THREE STEPS. Reginald once presided over an entire eviction hearing with a torn meniscus and a dress shoe full of what he later determined was marinara sauce, and not ONCE did The Court fail to descend into a basement when duty called. You had been in that basement SIX TIMES and yet on the seventh visit, the sacred final walkthrough, you treated it like a wine cellar at a party where you do not know the host. The washer and dryer were CONVEYING, agent, they were PROMISED to those buyers like a dowry in a medieval property transfer, and you let them vanish into the ether because your knee had opinions. Your broker's quiet disappointment is a sentence far worse than anything this Court could impose, and frankly I am going to think about her saying next time take the stairs for the rest of the week because MY mother once said something similar about a lawnmower and I still cannot discuss it. As established in Maytag v. That Guy Who Definitely Should Have Just Taken Some Ibuprofen, 2019, a final walkthrough is not a suggestion, it is a COVENANT. The Court hereby orders you to descend every staircase you encounter for the next calendar year, regardless of destination, as penance. BAILIFF ROOMBA, ESCORT THIS CONFESSION TO THE ARCHIVE OF SHAME.
SCANDAL RATING: 6.4/10 Lazy Knee Defense
Advertisement
🥉 3RD PLACE
The Escrow Medal of Unremarkable Mediocrity
The least scandalous offering. Reggie was barely entertained.
CONFESSION #0470 — APPRAISAL DISASTER
The photos looked great. Staged it myself, spent two days on that house. Buyer comes in at 485, we counter at 479, everyone's happy. Then the appraiser shows up and I swear to god he was there twelve minutes. Twelve. I know because I was sitting in my car waiting for him to leave. He comes back at 431. My seller calls me screaming. "You said 480 was conservative." I did say that. I believed it. The comp he used was a foreclosure from eight months ago that sold with a caved-in garage. I called the lender and said "Can you explain this comp to me" and she goes "I don't pick the appraiser." Buyer won't make up the difference. Seller won't come down. Deal falls apart three days before closing. The appraiser's report said "dated kitchen." The kitchen was renovated in 2019. I still have the receipts from when we staged it. Brand new receipts, sitting in a dead deal file.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF AGGRAVATED APPRAISAL VICTIMHOOD IN THE FIRST DEGREE WITH MALICIOUS RECEIPT HOARDING
The Court has reviewed this confession and finds itself PHYSICALLY ILL at the mention of a twelve-minute appraisal, a duration Reginald would not accept for a microwave burrito let alone a half-million dollar asset. You sat in your car and COUNTED THE MINUTES, which tells this Court everything it needs to know about your mental state and also your data plan situation. The appraiser cited a foreclosure with a CAVED-IN GARAGE as a comparable property, which is like comparing a golden retriever to a raccoon that died under a porch simply because both technically occupied residential land. And "dated kitchen" for a 2019 renovation? I once ruled against a man for calling shaker cabinets "tired" and I would do it AGAIN. However, and The Court says this with the gravity of a thousand gavels, you are not innocent here because you BELIEVED your own pricing and belief is not a defense, it is a HOBBY. You are hoarding receipts in a dead deal file like a squirrel preparing for a winter that will never come, and that is not professionalism, that is a coping mechanism. The Court sentences you to one hour of staring at that file before deleting it forever, and also I must leave now because Order the Roomba has breached the chambers again.
SCANDAL RATING: 5.9/10 Appraisal Trauma Syndrome
Advertisement

Have a confession? Judge Reginald Escrow III's docket is always open.

Submit Anonymously → Subscribe to the Newsletter

← Back to the Full Docket