⚖️ DAILY CONTEST RESULTS
Saturday, May 23, 2026
Judge Reginald Escrow III has rendered his verdicts.
Advertisement
🥇 1ST PLACE
The Escrow Gold Gavel Award
The most scandalous confession of the day, as determined by Judge Reginald Escrow III.
CONFESSION #0554 — THE BUYER WHO NEVER BOUGHT
Her attorney got involved. That's how it ended. After eight months. Eight months of showing this woman houses every single weekend, sometimes twice on Saturdays because she'd see something new hit the market and couldn't wait until Sunday.
She had full pre-approval. Like, not the fake kind, the real kind. 620 thousand. Her lender called me directly to confirm. I have the email somewhere.
We wrote six offers. Six. Lost three to other buyers, fine, that happens. But the other three she pulled out of. One was because the neighbor had a boat in their driveway and she said that meant they were probably loud. A boat. In the driveway. Not even a big boat.
The second one, she didn't like how the seller responded to our inspection requests. Said they seemed defensive. They fixed everything we asked for. Everything. But the way they worded the response felt aggressive to her.
Third one closed without her because she needed another week to think and the sellers said no.
Then in month eight she finds a place she loves, we're under contract, inspection goes perfect, appraisal comes in at value, and her attorney—who she never mentioned before—reviews the HOA docs and finds some clause about rental restrictions and suddenly she's worried about her investment potential even though she told me repeatedly she was never going to rent it out.
Her attorney got involved and then she just stopped returning my calls.
I ran the numbers once. Gas alone was probably 400 dollars.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF AGGRAVATED CLIENT ABANDONMENT SYNDROME AND WANTON DESTRUCTION OF A REALTOR'S WILL TO LIVE
The Court has reviewed this EIGHT-MONTH ODYSSEY OF TORMENT and frankly, Reginald needs a moment. Six offers. SIX. This woman treated your professional expertise like a free subscription service she forgot to cancel, and that boat in the driveway — THE BOAT, counsel, THE BOAT — was not even a big boat, and yet it somehow became grounds for contract termination as if the neighbor was running a maritime smuggling operation out of their suburban split-level. I myself once refused to purchase a home because the seller had a decorative rooster in the kitchen and I STAND BY THAT DECISION, but at least I had the decency to ghost my agent in month TWO, not month eight after six written offers and four hundred dollars of Premium Unleaded sacrifice. The attorney appearing from the shadows like a legal assassin to murder a perfect transaction over theoretical rental restrictions she explicitly said she would never use is the kind of betrayal that belongs in Shakespeare, or at minimum a Dateline episode. This Court finds the client guilty of Emotional Racketeering under the precedent established in In re: That Guy Who Kept Saying He Was Serious This Time, 2019, and sentences her to an eternity of Zillow browsing with no saved searches. The Court must now adjourn because Order the Roomba has detected crumbs in the deliberation chamber and justice waits for no one.
Phantom Buyer Syndrome
Advertisement
🥈 2ND PLACE
The Certificate of Distinguished Incompetence
A noteworthy display of professional misfortune.
CONFESSION #0555 — BROKER DRAMA
The title search flagged something. An easement from 1987 that nobody disclosed, running right through where the new owners wanted to put their pool. The seller's agent swore she never saw it, which maybe, sure, but it was on page three of the preliminary report in twelve point font. Not hidden. Not buried. Just there, waiting for someone to read it.
My buyers wanted to close anyway, said they'd figure it out later. I told them that's not how easements work. They closed anyway. Three weeks later I get a call, they're screaming because the utility company showed up with equipment and started trenching. Right where the pool was gonna go. Right where I said.
They're threatening to sue their own agent. That's me.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF WILLFUL EASEMENT IGNORANCE IN THE FIRST DEGREE AND CONDUCT UNBECOMING A LITERATE PROFESSIONAL
Let The Court be absolutely clear about what has transpired here: a document sat on page three, in TWELVE POINT FONT, practically SCREAMING its existence into the void, and yet somehow an entire transaction proceeded as if reading had not been invented. The seller's agent claims she never saw it, which Reginald finds fascinating given that seeing things is LITERALLY THE JOB. And YOU, you counseled your buyers correctly, they ignored you, they closed anyway, and now THEY want to sue YOU? This is like a man setting his own house on fire and then suing the smoke detector for emotional distress. I once had a client who refused to read a HOA document and then acted SHOCKED when they couldn't keep their emotional support alpaca, and I think about Gerald the alpaca every single day, The Court will not lie to you. The utility company did not sneak up on anyone, they were INVITED by a thirty-seven-year-old easement that was sitting right there like a casserole at a potluck waiting to be acknowledged. Your buyers are guilty of terminal optimism, the seller's agent is guilty of whatever the opposite of due diligence is, and you are guilty only of believing that adults would behave like adults, which in this market is frankly naive. Case citation: In re: That Pool That Will Never Exist, 2024. The Court must now go water its fern, which unlike your clients, responds appropriately to clear instructions.
Easement Denialism Syndrome
Advertisement
🥉 3RD PLACE
The Escrow Medal of Unremarkable Mediocrity
The least scandalous offering. Reggie was barely entertained.
CONFESSION #0556 — SELLER WHO KEPT CHANGING THINGS
The MLS listing had a mistake. Wrong square footage. Seller caught it day one, fine, we fix it.
Monday: listing goes live.
Tuesday: seller wants to change the price.
Wednesday: new price is up.
Thursday: seller wants the old price back.
Friday: seller decides to include the washer dryer.
Saturday: seller changes mind about washer dryer.
Sunday: open house. Twelve people come through.
Monday: we get an offer. Full ask.
Tuesday: seller says she needs to think.
Wednesday: seller says she wants to wait for more offers.
Thursday: buyer walks.
Friday: seller asks where the buyer went.
She called me six more times that month. Changed the photos twice. Switched agents in October. House sold in March for twenty thousand less than that first offer. I still have her number blocked.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF ENABLING CHRONIC INDECISION IN THE FIRST DEGREE AND FAILURE TO INTERVENE IN A SLOW-MOTION FINANCIAL SELF-IMMOLATION
The Court has reviewed this timeline with the same horror one reserves for watching a toddler reach for a hot stove fourteen times while the babysitter just takes notes. YOU HAD A FULL ASK OFFER ON DAY EIGHT and you let this woman think about it like she was selecting a LIFE PARTNER and not accepting LEGAL TENDER for her SUBURBAN THREE-BEDROOM. The washer dryer flip-flop alone constitutes a violation of In re: Just Pick Something Already, 2019, wherein The Court ruled that appliance indecision lasting more than four hours is grounds for involuntary commitment. Reginald himself once lost a vintage credenza because he hesitated for ONE AFTERNOON, and that memory haunts me every time I see Danish Modern furniture, which is FREQUENTLY because I have TASTE. You watched this woman hemorrhage twenty thousand dollars in slow motion, blocked her number like a coward, and now you confess to this Court as if documentation absolves you of your complicity in her financial unraveling. The switched agents, the photo changes, the October betrayal — all of it could have been prevented if you had simply said the words NO MORE CHANGES, BRENDA, WE ARE SIGNING TODAY. This Court finds you guilty, orders you to unblock that number and send one text that simply reads "I should have stopped you," and declares this matter CLOSED because Reginald has a showing at four and refuses to discuss barn doors with the listing agent.
Enabler of Chaos
Advertisement
Have a confession? Judge Reginald Escrow III's docket is always open.