⚖️ DAILY CONTEST RESULTS

Sunday, May 24, 2026

Judge Reginald Escrow III has rendered his verdicts.
Advertisement
🥇 1ST PLACE
The Escrow Gold Gavel Award
The most scandalous confession of the day, as determined by Judge Reginald Escrow III.
CONFESSION #0557 — SELLER WHO KEPT CHANGING THINGS
The MLS listing had a mistake. Square footage was off by like 200 feet, my fault, I owned it. Called the seller to let him know I was fixing it. He says "while you're in there, change the price." Okay. "And take out the part about the pool." Sir, you have a pool. "I know but I don't want pool people." What does that mean. "You know what it means." Changed the price. Left the pool in. Three days later he calls, wants the price back where it was. Then he wants new photos because "the light looks cold." The light. In photographs. Of his house. Photographer goes back out, 400 bucks. Seller doesn't like those either. "The kitchen looks small." The kitchen is small. That's not a photography problem. We finally get an offer, solid offer, 12 thousand under asking. He counters at full price plus he wants them to pay for a new mailbox. A mailbox. "The current one has sentimental value." They walked. Obviously they walked.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF AGGRAVATED CLIENT TOLERANCE IN THE FIRST DEGREE WITH SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES OF MAILBOX-RELATED DELUSION
The Court has reviewed this confession and frankly, Reginald needs a moment. You stood there while a grown man tried to discriminate against POOL PEOPLE, a protected class that includes everyone who has ever enjoyed buoyancy, and you said nothing except to quietly leave the pool in the listing like some kind of aquatic whistleblower. The light looked COLD? THE LIGHT? This Court once dismissed a case because the courtroom fluorescents made my gavel look "too aggressive" so I understand lighting concerns but YOUR CLIENT wanted to charge four hundred dollars to fix the EMOTIONAL TEMPERATURE of photons. And then, AND THEN, this man fumbled a twelve thousand dollar gap over a MAILBOX with SENTIMENTAL VALUE. What sentiment? What memories does one form with a mailbox? Did he propose to it? Did it raise him? In the landmark case of Sellers Who Need Therapy v. Agents Who Enable Them, 2019, the court established that tolerating this level of nonsense without once saying "sir, respectfully, what is wrong with you" constitutes professional malpractice of the soul. You are guilty, the seller is guilty, that mailbox is DEFINITELY guilty of something, and The Court must now adjourn because Order the Roomba has wandered into the jury box again and someone needs to redirect him toward the evidence.
SCANDAL RATING: 6.8/10 Mailbox Hostage Situation
Advertisement
🥈 2ND PLACE
The Certificate of Distinguished Incompetence
A noteworthy display of professional misfortune.
CONFESSION #0558 — HOA HORROR
The photos looked great. That was the whole problem. Seller wanted to list fast, I shot the backyard myself on a Tuesday morning, everything looked perfect. Green lawn, nice fence, little patio area. Sold in nine days, cash buyer, everyone's thrilled. Three weeks after closing the buyer calls me screaming. Turns out the HOA had cited the previous owner six times for the shed in the back corner. The shed I cropped out of every single photo because it looked kind of rough. The shed that apparently violates setback rules by four feet and has to come down. Twelve thousand dollars to demo and haul it, plus the accumulated fines the seller never disclosed, which were like another three grand. My broker asked me point blank if I knew about the violations. I said no. Which was true. But I knew something was off with that shed. I knew it and I made it disappear from the listing and I told myself that wasn't the same thing. Buyer's attorney sent a letter last week.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF PREMEDITATED SHED CONCEALMENT AND WILLFUL PHOTOGRAPHIC OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
The Court has reviewed this confession and finds itself PHYSICALLY ILL at the audacity on display. You cropped out a shed, and now you sit here parsing ELizabethan distinctions between "knowing" and "knowing something was off" as if this Court was born in a BARN — which, incidentally, would at least have proper setbacks unlike your little violation shack. Let Reginald be perfectly clear: when a real estate professional sees a structure that looks "kind of rough" and responds by making it vanish from the visual record like some kind of discount David Copperfield, that is not marketing, that is MAGIC, and magic has no place in residential transactions. I once refused to purchase a perfectly adequate condo because the listing photos suspiciously never showed the laundry closet and I was RIGHT because that closet contained CARPET, which is a choice only made by people hiding something. The buyer's attorney sending a letter is the least of your cosmic concerns because somewhere in the universe a shed is waiting for you, and that shed will have YOUR name on the citation. This Court finds the defendant's camera work to be a weapon of mass deception and hereby orders the confession sealed in the permanent record under "Things That Make Reginald Need A Moment." The gavel has spoken and now so has my blood pressure medication alarm.
SCANDAL RATING: 6.3/10 Cropped With Intent
Advertisement
🥉 3RD PLACE
The Escrow Medal of Unremarkable Mediocrity
The least scandalous offering. Reggie was barely entertained.
CONFESSION #0559 — LOWBALL OFFER
The lender called three days before closing. Not my lender, theirs. Buyer's loan officer says there's an issue with the appraisal, it came in at 285 and we're under contract at 310. Which okay, appraisal gaps happen, I get it. But then the buyer's agent calls me and says her clients want to renegotiate to 275. 275. That's not bridging a gap. That's a lowball offer wearing a different hat. My seller already dropped 15 grand from list, already paid for the roof inspection they demanded, already agreed to leave the washer and dryer. And now three days out, three days, they want another 35 thousand off because why? Because they think we're desperate? The buyer's agent keeps saying her clients are nervous about overpaying. Nervous. They've been in this house four times. They wrote love letters about the backyard. They asked if the sellers would leave the curtains in the dining room. But sure, now they're nervous. My seller is a retired teacher. She's got movers booked for Saturday. Her daughter already flew in from Ohio to help her pack. The deposit on her new place in Florida is nonrefundable. And this agent, she keeps texting me like we're teammates. Like we're both just trying to make this work. She sent me a smiley face emoji after asking for 35 thousand dollars. I told my seller we can counter at 295 and see what happens. She just looked at me and said she was tired. That's the word she used. Tired.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF AGGRAVATED EMOTIONAL EXTORTION WITH A SMILEY FACE ENHANCEMENT
The Court has reviewed this confession and frankly, Reginald needs a moment because that SMILEY FACE EMOJI has sent me into a judicial spiral from which I may not recover. Let the record show that sending a smiley face after demanding thirty-five thousand dollars is not negotiation, it is PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE disguised as cheerfulness, and this Court has seen similar tactics only once before in the infamous case of Passive Aggressive Realty Group v. Basic Human Decency, 2022. These buyers wrote LOVE LETTERS about the backyard, they asked about the CURTAINS, they have been in this home FOUR TIMES like it was some kind of shrine to their future happiness, and now three days before closing they suddenly develop a case of the nervousness that just HAPPENS to be worth exactly thirty-five thousand dollars? The Court notes that this agent texted like a teammate while playing for the opposing team, which reminds me of my third wife who used to say we should communicate more while simultaneously communicating with her Pilates instructor named Todd but THAT IS NOT RELEVANT HERE. Your retired teacher client said she was tired, and this Court understands tired because Reginald once presided over a dual agency dispute that lasted eleven hours and by the end I was ruling in favor of the ceiling fan just to feel something. The appraisal gap was twenty-five thousand but they demanded thirty-five, which means this was never about value, it was about seeing how much blood they could squeeze from a woman who already has movers booked for Saturday.
SCANDAL RATING: 5.8/10 Smiley Face Larceny
Advertisement

Have a confession? Judge Reginald Escrow III's docket is always open.

Submit Anonymously → Subscribe to the Newsletter

← Back to the Full Docket