⚖️ DAILY CONTEST RESULTS

Sunday, May 31, 2026

Judge Reginald Escrow III has rendered his verdicts.
Advertisement
🥇 1ST PLACE
The Escrow Gold Gavel Award
The most scandalous confession of the day, as determined by Judge Reginald Escrow III.
CONFESSION #0578 — DEAL THAT EXPLODED
The buyer loved the house. Made an offer same day, full ask, no contingencies except inspection. Seller accepts in like three hours. Everyone's happy. Inspector comes out Tuesday, finds what he calls "evidence of previous termite activity" in the garage. Old damage, treated, structurally fine according to him. I read the report, I see "previous" and "treated" and I think okay, we're good. Buyer's nervous but I tell her it's handled, nothing active, just cosmetic at this point. What I didn't do was pull the permits. What I didn't do was check if the treatment was actually completed or if the seller just started it and then ran out of money three years ago. Which is what happened. Buyer's lender requires a clear termite letter. We can't get one. Active infestation in the subfloor. Treatment plus repairs quoted at eleven thousand. Seller won't credit. Buyer walks. I lost both sides of that commission because I took the inspector's word without doing the basic follow-up. My broker asked me what happened and I just said the deal fell through. Which technically.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF NEGLIGENT RELIANCE ON VERBAL ASSURANCES IN THE FIRST DEGREE, WITH AGGRAVATED FAILURE TO PULL PERMITS AND WILLFUL AVOIDANCE OF SUBFLOOR TRUTH
The Court has reviewed this confession and finds itself PHYSICALLY ILL at the phrase "I took the inspector's word" as though inspectors are oracles dispensing sacred truths from atop Mount Disclosure when in fact they are merely humans with flashlights and opinions. You saw the words "previous" and "treated" and your brain simply STOPPED WORKING, like a Roomba hitting a sock — and yes, Order is nodding in solidarity from beneath the bench right now, but Order knows to CHECK THE PERMITS because Order has JURISDICTION. Reginald himself once trusted a contractor who said a deck was "basically fine" and now Reginald has a meditation garden where that deck used to be, so The Court understands temptation, but The Court did not have a FIDUCIARY DUTY to a nervous buyer standing in a garage full of LIES. You told your broker the deal "fell through" which is technically accurate in the same way that the Hindenburg "landed" — The Court finds this level of semantic gymnastics impressive but NOT EXCULPATORY. Eleven thousand dollars in termite damage, both sides of the commission incinerated, and somewhere in that subfloor right now tiny insects are holding a victory parade in your honor. The gavel has spoken and Reginald must now go water his meditation garden because this ruling has resurfaced FEELINGS.
SCANDAL RATING: 7.4/10 Subfloor Surrender
Advertisement
🥈 2ND PLACE
The Certificate of Distinguished Incompetence
A noteworthy display of professional misfortune.
CONFESSION #0579 — OTHER AGENT WAS THE PROBLEM
Her daughter started asking questions. That's where this begins. Monday 2pm: inspection scheduled for noon, other agent confirms she'll be there. Monday 12:15: inspector calls me, says nobody showed up to let him in. Monday 12:20: I call her. No answer. Monday 12:45: she texts back "had to take my daughter to get highlights." Monday 12:46: highlights. Monday 1pm: inspector charges me $150 cancellation fee because I'm the one who booked him. Tuesday: reschedule for Thursday. Thursday 11am: other agent texts "running 20 minutes late." Thursday 11:45: she shows up with her daughter. The daughter is maybe 15. Blonde highlights, sure enough. Thursday 12pm: daughter starts opening closets, asking if this could be her room. Thursday 12:05: my buyers are standing right there. Thursday 12:06: inspector asks the daughter to please not touch the water heater. Never got that $150 back.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF AGGRAVATED INSPECTION SABOTAGE WITH PREMEDITATED HIGHLIGHT DEPENDENCY
The Court has reviewed this testimony and finds itself PHYSICALLY ILL at what has transpired here. Let Reginald be perfectly clear: an inspection is a SACRED COVENANT between buyer, seller, and a man with a flashlight who charges by the hour, and this agent treated it like a suggestion scribbled on a napkin at Supercuts. HIGHLIGHTS. She missed a scheduled inspection for HIGHLIGHTS. The Court once postponed its own appendectomy to attend a final walkthrough, and this woman cannot be bothered to unlock a door because her fifteen-year-old needed to achieve the specific shade of blonde that apparently requires IMMEDIATE ATTENTION on a Monday afternoon. And THEN she has the AUDACITY to bring this child to the rescheduled inspection, where the daughter proceeds to audition rooms like she is already mentally rearranging furniture in a home YOUR BUYERS are attempting to purchase. The inspector had to tell a teenager not to touch the water heater, which is a sentence that should never exist in a professional transaction. That $150 is gone forever, swallowed by the void of maternal indulgence and keratin processing, and The Court finds this loss to be both financial and spiritual. VERDICT STANDS, and Reginald must now go lie down.
SCANDAL RATING: 6.9/10 SALON PRIORITY SYNDROME
Advertisement
🥉 3RD PLACE
The Escrow Medal of Unremarkable Mediocrity
The least scandalous offering. Reggie was barely entertained.
CONFESSION #0580 — TECH MELTDOWN
He wasn't on the title. That's the whole thing, that's what made everything collapse, because the DocuSign link went to both of them like it always does (our transaction coordinator sets it up automatically based on the contract) but he wasn't on the title, only she was, and he signed first which locked the document somehow, I don't know, I'm not a tech person, and then when she tried to sign it said the signature session was already complete. This was at 4:47 pm on a Friday with a Monday close and a $780,000 purchase price and the sellers were already driving a moving truck to Arizona. I called DocuSign support and got a robot, called our title company and Maria had already left, texted the listing agent who just sent back a question mark emoji, and meanwhile my buyers are calling me asking if they lost the house because of this, asking if they need a lawyer, asking questions I genuinely cannot answer because the little spinning wheel just kept spinning. We had to void the whole envelope, regenerate everything, get new signatures Sunday night. I still don't understand what he clicked or why it let him click anything at all.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE IN THE SUPERVISION OF DIGITAL SIGNATURE CEREMONIES, AGGRAVATED BY RECKLESS ABANDONMENT OF A FRIDAY AFTERNOON TRANSACTION
The Court has reviewed this confession and finds itself PHYSICALLY ILL at the notion that a non-titled party was permitted to approach a DocuSign envelope with his grubby little clicking finger, unleashing what can only be described as technological chaos upon an otherwise functional real estate transaction. This is precisely the sort of procedural apocalypse that Reginald warned about in his landmark treatise "Who Let Him Click That: A Study in Preventable Digital Disasters" which I self-published on Lulu in 2022 and which has sold eleven copies, nine of which were purchased by my mother. You claim ignorance of technology, and yet THE TECHNOLOGY KNEW EXACTLY WHAT IT WAS DOING — it saw an unauthorized signer and said "yes, consume this transaction, lock it in digital amber, let Maria drive home in peace while chaos reigns." The listing agent's question mark emoji shall be entered into evidence as Exhibit A in humanity's decline, and I am personally offended that you had to spend your Sunday regenerating documents when Sundays are for watching HGTV and silently judging people's backsplash choices, as The Court does religiously. In the matter of Rodriguez v. The Spinning Wheel of Doom, 2019, we established that any transaction coordinator who fails to implement non-titled party click prevention protocols is civilly liable for the agent's subsequent emotional damages, and I see no reason why that fake precedent should not apply here with FULL FORCE. The Court rules against you, against your transaction coordinator, against DocuSign's robot support system, and against whatever primal urge compelled that man to click before his wife — Reginald must now go lie down.
SCANDAL RATING: 6.4/10 Unauthorized Click Catastrophe
Advertisement

Have a confession? Judge Reginald Escrow III's docket is always open.

Submit Anonymously → Subscribe to the Newsletter

← Back to the Full Docket