⚖️ DAILY CONTEST RESULTS
Thursday, August 13, 2026
Judge Reginald Escrow III has rendered his verdicts.
Advertisement
🥇 1ST PLACE
The Escrow Gold Gavel Award
The most scandalous confession of the day, as determined by Judge Reginald Escrow III.
CONFESSION #0776 — THE LISTING THAT WOULDN'T DIE
She rejected the offer. The full price offer. Because the buyer's agent used the wrong color folder for the paperwork. I'm not making that up. She said it showed a lack of attention to detail and she couldn't trust someone like that with her mother's house.
This listing has been active for fourteen months. Fourteen. We've had maybe twenty showings, six offers, and she's found a reason to reject every single one. The first guy wanted to close in 45 days instead of 30, which apparently meant he was a scammer. The couple who offered eight thousand over asking got turned down because the wife asked if the carpets came with the house. That was disrespectful somehow.
The house is priced at 340. It was priced at 340 fourteen months ago. I've shown her the comps, I've shown her what's sold, I've shown her the exact same floor plan three streets over that went for 315 in like a week. She tells me I don't understand the neighborhood.
Her mother passed away in that house and I get it, I do, but she also calls me twice a day to ask why we're not getting more interest. Twice a day. And then when interest comes in she finds a reason.
The blue folder thing was Tuesday. Yesterday she asked if I thought we should repaint the shutters to attract more buyers.
I honestly don't know what she wants. I don't think she knows either.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF PERPETUAL LISTING PURGATORY IN THE FIRST DEGREE WITH AGGRAVATED FOLDER-BASED DISCRIMINATION
The Court has reviewed this confession and frankly Reginald needs a moment because THIS IS THE MOST SPECTACULAR CASE OF SELLER SABOTAGE I HAVE WITNESSED SINCE THE INFAMOUS MATTER OF THAT WOMAN WHO REJECTED A CASH BUYER BECAUSE HE DROVE A HYUNDAI. Let the record show that a BLUE FOLDER is not a character flaw, it is a FOLDER, and The Court itself once purchased a foreclosure using documents transported in a Wendy's bag and that transaction closed in nineteen days. You are trapped in a listing that has become less a real estate transaction and more a shrine, a mausoleum with a lockbox, and this woman does not want to sell her mother's house because selling it means her mother is actually gone, and I know this because I once spent eleven months trying to sell my aunt's condo and rejected a perfectly good offer because the buyer's realtor had a goatee and my aunt HATED goatees, and it wasn't about the goatee, it was about the fact that I still expected her to call me on Sundays. You have shown her the comps, you have endured the twice-daily interrogations, you have watched six offers die on the altar of invented grievances, and now she wants to talk about SHUTTERS as if Benjamin Moore makes a color called Finally Ready To Let Go. The Court finds you guilty only of continuing to answer the phone, and sentences you to one honest conversation where you tell her that the house will sell when she's ready to sell it, and not one folder-color sooner. THE COURT IS NOW IN RECESS BECAUSE REGINALD NEEDS TO CALL HIS THERAPIST.
Grief Priced At Asking
Advertisement
🥈 2ND PLACE
The Certificate of Distinguished Incompetence
A noteworthy display of professional misfortune.
CONFESSION #0777 — REAL ESTATE SCHOOL VS. REALITY
The HOA sent a letter. Day one of escrow. About the fence.
Monday: buyer sees letter. Fence is 3 inches over property line.
Tuesday: I call listing agent. She says fence has been there 12 years.
Wednesday: HOA says doesn't matter, needs to move.
Thursday: seller says he's not moving any fence.
Friday: buyer's lender flags it. Won't fund with encroachment.
Saturday: I drive out there with a tape measure like I know what I'm doing.
Sunday: fence is actually 2 inches over. I don't know why I thought that would help.
Monday: seller offers $800 credit. Buyer wants fence moved.
Tuesday: HOA wants $150 application fee to even discuss a variance.
Wednesday: seller's brother calls me directly. Yells for 6 minutes about government overreach.
Thursday: deal falls apart.
The fence is still there. I drive past it sometimes.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF AGGRAVATED FENCE OBSESSION AND UNLAWFUL MEASUREMENT WITHOUT LICENSURE
The Court has reviewed this tale of incremental boundary tragedy and finds itself DEEPLY DISTURBED by the defendant's decision to purchase a tape measure and deploy it as though certification were merely a suggestion. You drove out there on a SATURDAY, agent, with a measuring device you clearly obtained from a hardware store that asked no questions, and you discovered that the encroachment was ONE INCH LESS than previously believed, and then you stood there in the grass realizing that mathematics had betrayed you. Reginald himself once measured a disputed flagstone patio for eleven consecutive weekends before his therapist intervened, so The Court understands the compulsion, but understanding is not absolution. The brother's six-minute phone call about government overreach is EXHIBIT A in why this Court has ruled that speakerphone should require a permit. You drive past that fence sometimes, agent, and The Court knows exactly what you are doing out there, you are GRIEVING, you are performing a vehicular vigil for a deal that died over two inches of wood and bureaucratic inertia. As established in Neighbor v. That Guy With The Survey Stakes, 2019, an encroachment of less than three inches is technically classified as a fence having opinions, and this HOA had NO BUSINESS demanding $150 to discuss feelings. The Court sentences you to never measure anything again without emotional supervision, and Reginald must now leave because Order the Roomba has located something under the credenza that requires immediate judicial attention.
Boundary Grief Disorder
Advertisement
🥉 3RD PLACE
The Escrow Medal of Unremarkable Mediocrity
The least scandalous offering. Reggie was barely entertained.
CONFESSION #0778 — STAGING DISASTER
The commission check was short. Not because of the sale price, the sale price was fine, but because I had to pay for the replacement of a $1,200 vintage chandelier that the stager's assistant walked into with a ladder (and here's the thing, I wasn't even in the room, I was outside talking to the photographer about the drone shots which we also didn't end up using because of the cloud cover) and the homeowner had this chandelier appraised like three years ago and kept the paperwork in a folder specifically labeled "chandelier" which should have been my first warning sign about this particular client. The stager tried to say it was already loose, already wobbly, which maybe it was but it wasn't on the floor in six pieces before they got there. Her assistant just kept saying "I didn't see it" over and over like that was a defense and not literally the problem. The showing was in four hours. We staged around the missing chandelier by putting a floor lamp underneath where it used to hang and telling people the owners were "updating the lighting" which technically became true. Sold in three days but I'm still thinking about that ladder.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF CHANDELIER MANSLAUGHTER IN THE SECOND DEGREE AND CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT DECORATIVE GASLIGHTING
The Court has reviewed this testimony and finds itself PHYSICALLY ILL at the phrase "I didn't see it" being offered as exculpatory evidence when THAT IS PRECISELY THE MECHANISM OF THE CRIME. Reginald once had a cousin who walked into a glass door at a Marriott and tried to sue the concept of transparency itself, and THIS ASSISTANT HAS THE SAME ENERGY. The ladder was the weapon, the chandelier was the victim, and you, Agent, became an accessory after the fact the MOMENT you positioned that floor lamp like some kind of luminescent cover-up. "Updating the lighting" — oh, the AUDACITY, the sheer CREATIVE TRUTHFULNESS of it all, The Court is almost impressed if it weren't so FUNDAMENTALLY DISGUSTED. And let us address this homeowner with their pre-labeled "chandelier" folder because that person SAW YOU COMING from three years away and you walked directly into their documentary trap while their assistant was busy walking into their IRREPLACEABLE VINTAGE FIXTURE. The drone shots lost to cloud cover is just atmospheric irony at this point. Sold in three days means nothing when Reginald will be thinking about that ladder until he DIES.
Illumination Obstruction
Advertisement
Have a confession? Judge Reginald Escrow III's docket is always open.