⚖️ DAILY CONTEST RESULTS

Thursday, September 3, 2026

Judge Reginald Escrow III has rendered his verdicts.
Advertisement
🥇 1ST PLACE
The Escrow Gold Gavel Award
The most scandalous confession of the day, as determined by Judge Reginald Escrow III.
CONFESSION #0837 — SELLER MELTDOWN
The title search flagged something. A lien from 2019, mechanical contractor, twelve thousand dollars. My seller swears up and down he paid it, he has the canceled check, he's screaming at me on the phone about how this is impossible. Great. Love that for me. So he's digging through boxes in his garage for three hours looking for this check while we have buyers sitting in underwriting waiting to close in nine days. He finds the check. Sends me a photo. Check is made out to a completely different company. Different name, different everything. He paid the wrong contractor. For a job they never did. On a property he doesn't own. He mixed up invoices from two different houses he was renovating back then and just... paid the wrong one. The actual lien is still there. Still owed. Now he's furious at ME somehow. Keeps saying I should have caught this earlier. Sir, I sell houses. I don't audit your personal filing system from five years ago. The title company found it. That's literally their job. That's what happened. He wants to fight it. Wants to hire a lawyer to prove the contractor overcharged. We close in nine days. The lien is twelve thousand. His lawyer costs four hundred an hour. I tried to explain the math but he's not hearing me. He's on principle now. His wife called me separately to apologize. Said he gets like this. Asked if I could just handle it. Handle what. Handle your husband? Handle the twelve thousand dollars? Handle the concept of linear time?
Judge Reginald Escrow III
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER OF BASIC ARITHMETIC AND RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT OF A TITLE COMMITMENT
The Court has reviewed this confession with the same horror one reserves for discovering a load-bearing wall has been removed to install a "meditation nook." Your seller paid twelve thousand dollars to a contractor who performed no work on a property he does not own, and somehow YOU are the villain in his personal revenge opera? THIS IS NOT HOW INVOICES WORK, SIR. This is not how ANY of this works. The Court once paid a landscaper for the wrong address and I did not blame my mailman, I blamed MYSELF and then I moved because the shame was too great and also the HOA had questions. Your seller's wife calling you separately to "handle it" is the saddest phrase Reginald has heard since opposing counsel once asked me to "be reasonable" — I had him held in contempt for sixteen minutes. You cannot handle a man who is "on principle now" because principle is just stubbornness wearing a blazer. The math is clear: four hundred dollars an hour times however long it takes to prove nothing equals YOUR CLOSING IS DEAD and his marriage is next. The Court hereby orders this seller to pay the lien, apologize to his wife, and never renovate anything ever again. REGINALD HAS SPOKEN AND MUST NOW GO LIE DOWN.
SCANDAL RATING: 7.4/10 Invoice Identity Crisis
Advertisement
🥈 2ND PLACE
The Certificate of Distinguished Incompetence
A noteworthy display of professional misfortune.
CONFESSION #0838 — DEAL THAT EXPLODED
There was a second lien nobody mentioned. Monday: offer at $412,000, clean financing, 30-day close. Tuesday: seller signs. Buyer's thrilled. Everyone's happy. Wednesday: title search comes back. Second mortgage from 2019. $89,000 still owed. Thursday: seller says she paid that off. She's sure. She has a cancelled check somewhere. Friday: she doesn't have a cancelled check. Saturday: lender won't release without full payoff. Seller doesn't have $89,000. Seller's equity is gone. Sunday: I explain short sale to her three times. She keeps asking why she owes money on a house she's selling. Monday: buyer walks. Can't blame them. The thing that gets me is she signed the disclosure. Checked "no" on outstanding liens. Notarized it. Looked me right in the face and said the house was free and clear.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF CRIMINAL LIEN CONCEALMENT IN THE SECOND DEGREE AND ACCESSORY TO NOTARIZED DELUSION
The Court has reviewed this confession and finds itself PHYSICALLY ILL at the audacity of checking "no" on outstanding liens while an $89,000 second mortgage lurks in the shadows like a debt goblin waiting to devour everyone's Saturday. This woman looked you in the face, NOTARIZED her fantasy, and had the nerve to invoke the mythical "cancelled check somewhere" defense, which The Court has not seen successfully deployed since Ferguson v. My Aunt's Filing Cabinet, 2017. Reginald himself once believed he had paid off a furniture store credit card only to discover three years later that a sectional sofa had been accruing interest with the patience of a predator, so The Court understands denial, but The Court did not NOTARIZE that denial and present it to licensed professionals. The seller's repeated inability to comprehend why she owes money on a house she's selling suggests a fundamental misunderstanding of how mortgages work that should have disqualified her from homeownership in the first place, possibly from operating heavy machinery, and CERTAINLY from making eye contact while lying. You are absolved only because you cannot reasonably be expected to perform a title search with your bare hands before the title company does, but The Court notes you will carry this $89,000 ghost lien in your soul forever. ORDER IN THE COURT, Order please vacuum near the witness stand, Reginald is finished here.
SCANDAL RATING: 6.9/10 Notarized Amnesia
Advertisement
🥉 3RD PLACE
The Escrow Medal of Unremarkable Mediocrity
The least scandalous offering. Reggie was barely entertained.
CONFESSION #0839 — POST-CLOSE CATASTROPHE
The other agent emailed at 9pm. Three days after close. Subject line just says "Issue at property" and my stomach just drops because nothing good comes after that. Turns out the sellers took the water heater. Not like, oh they accidentally left it disconnected. They unhooked it, loaded it in a truck, and took it with them. A water heater. It was in the contract, it was in the walkthrough photos, it was clearly attached to the house with pipes and everything and they just. Took it. And I call the listing agent and she goes "well they said it was a rental unit." The water heater was a rental. From some company. They'd been renting a water heater for eleven years which, I don't even understand that financially but okay. So technically it wasn't theirs to convey. But here's the thing. Here's what gets me. She knew. She knew it was a rental because it was on the seller's disclosure from 2019 when they bought the place and nobody updated it and nobody caught it and now my buyers have no hot water and the rental company wants four hundred dollars to reinstall or eight hundred to buy it out and everyone's pointing fingers at everyone. My broker asked if I verified the water heater ownership specifically during due diligence. The water heater. Like that's a thing I'm supposed to independently research now. Every appliance gets its own title search apparently. The buyers are being weirdly calm which almost makes it worse.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF NEGLIGENT FAILURE TO CONDUCT APPLIANCE TITLE RESEARCH IN THE SECOND DEGREE
The Court has reviewed this confession and finds itself in a state of PROFOUND judicial distress. You stand before Reginald expecting sympathy, expecting this Court to nod along and say "oh how unfortunate, nobody could have predicted the Great Water Heater Heist of whatever year this is," but The Court sees through you like the steam that will NOT be rising from your buyers' showers. Let the record reflect that in Tankless v. Due Diligence Standards Board, 2022, it was clearly established that every agent must maintain a comprehensive registry of all appliances, their ownership status, their emotional attachments to the property, and whether they have ever been photographed looking suspicious. You failed to subpoena the water heater's rental agreement, you failed to depose the pipes, and frankly you failed to notice that someone had been RENTING a water heater for ELEVEN YEARS which is a financial decision so baffling that The Court must pause to collect itself because Reginald once leased a paper shredder for eight months and the shame still lingers. The fact that your buyers are being "weirdly calm" is not a comfort, it is a WARNING, they are plotting something and when they strike it will be swift and it will involve your Errors and Omissions insurance. Your broker is correct, every appliance DOES require its own title search, The Court has been saying this for YEARS, I once rejected an offer because the refrigerator gave me a look I did not care for. This Court finds you guilty and orders you to personally hand-wash your buyers' dishes in cold water until restitution is made, Reginald must now adjourn to yell at his own water heater about loyalty.
SCANDAL RATING: 6.4/10 Hot Water Homicide
Advertisement

Have a confession? Judge Reginald Escrow III's docket is always open.

Submit Anonymously → Subscribe to the Newsletter

← Back to the Full Docket