⚖️ DAILY CONTEST RESULTS

Saturday, October 10, 2026

Judge Reginald Escrow III has rendered his verdicts.
Advertisement
🥇 1ST PLACE
The Escrow Gold Gavel Award
The most scandalous confession of the day, as determined by Judge Reginald Escrow III.
CONFESSION #0939 — REAL ESTATE SCHOOL VS. REALITY
She called on a Sunday. Buyer I'd been working with for three months, we're supposed to close Tuesday. She says her dad looked at the inspection report and he thinks the foundation is bad. I tell her we had a structural engineer out, he signed off, everything's fine. She says her dad used to do construction in the 80s and he knows what he's looking at. I ask if her dad saw the actual report. She says no but she described it to him. So I spend two hours on the phone walking her through every line item while she relays it to her dad who is apparently shouting in the background. Finally she says okay, they'll proceed. Monday morning she backs out. Says her dad found a better house in a different state. She'd been looking the whole time. The sellers had already moved out.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF AIDING AND ABETTING TELEPHONIC PARRICIDE OF A PERFECTLY GOOD TRANSACTION WHILE A GROWN WOMAN'S FATHER COMMITTED INSPECTION REPORT TERRORISM FROM AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION
The Court has reviewed this confession and frankly Reginald needs a moment because THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED TO ME IN 2017 EXCEPT IT WAS A COUSIN AND THE HOUSE WAS IN AKRON. You spent two hours, TWO HOURS, serving as a human fax machine between a buyer who had already emotionally moved to another state and a man whose construction knowledge expired when Reagan was in office, and you thought you were making progress? The dad was not evaluating a foundation, he was running interference while his daughter window-shopped on Redfin like some kind of real estate double agent. Per the landmark decision in Screaming Dad v. Structural Engineering Degree, 2019, background shouting does not constitute a professional opinion and describing an inspection report to your father is not the same as SHOWING HIM THE INSPECTION REPORT. The sellers moved out, the sellers MOVED OUT, and this woman was browsing listings in quote unquote a different state like she was picking a vacation rental. The Court finds that you were not an agent in this transaction but rather a hostage negotiator who never realized the hostage had already escaped through the back window. This Court is now in recess because Reginald must go yell at his own ceiling for twenty minutes.
SCANDAL RATING: 6.7/10 Phantom Buyer Syndrome
Advertisement
🥈 2ND PLACE
The Certificate of Distinguished Incompetence
A noteworthy display of professional misfortune.
CONFESSION #0940 — TECH MELTDOWN
The offer came in under asking. Friday 4pm: I upload all the counteroffer docs to DocuSign. Friday 4:07pm: DocuSign crashes. Not my account. The whole platform. Friday 4:08pm: buyer's agent calls asking where the docs are. Friday 4:09pm: I check Twitter and DocuSign is trending. Friday 4:30pm: still down. Friday 5pm: buyer's agent says her clients are going to dinner, won't look at anything until tomorrow. Friday 5:12pm: DocuSign comes back. Friday 5:13pm: my seller calls and says she changed her mind on the price, wants to counter higher. Saturday 9am: buyer finds another house. Monday: my seller asks why I let this fall through. The difference was $8,000. Eight thousand dollars and a server somewhere in California.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF NEGLIGENT SURRENDER TO TECHNOLOGICAL CIRCUMSTANCE IN THE FIRST DEGREE
The Court has reviewed this confession and finds itself PHYSICALLY ILL at the audacity of blaming a server in California for your own failure to pick up a telephone like a HUMAN PERSON WHO SELLS HOUSES FOR A LIVING. Reginald himself once lost a ruling when his printer jammed during a critical deliberation, and do you know what he did? He HAND-DELIVERED his verdict via bicycle to the defendant's place of business, which was a Chili's, but THAT IS BESIDE THE POINT. You had from 4:07pm to 5:12pm — SIXTY-FIVE MINUTES — to fax, email a PDF, dictate terms over speakerphone, send a carrier pigeon, or simply DRIVE TO THE BUYER'S DINNER LOCATION and slide a napkin across the table like the desperate closer you should have been. Instead you sat there refreshing Twitter like a teenager waiting for concert tickets while eight thousand dollars evaporated into the digital ether. The Court cites the landmark precedent of Fax Machine v. The Entire 1990s, which clearly established that backup communication methods exist for EXACTLY THIS REASON. Your seller is correct to question you, DocuSign owes you nothing, and The Court must now adjourn because Order the Roomba has gotten stuck under the witness stand again and is making a sound that suggests jurisdictional distress.
SCANDAL RATING: 6.2/10 Digital Surrender Doctrine
Advertisement
🥉 3RD PLACE
The Escrow Medal of Unremarkable Mediocrity
The least scandalous offering. Reggie was barely entertained.
CONFESSION #0941 — ZILLOW ESTIMATE WAR
We were in multiple offers. Good house, priced right, four offers came in by noon. My buyer went 20 over asking, waived inspection, the whole thing. We lost to someone who offered list price. Cash, sure, but the seller picked them because the Zestimate said the house was worth 40 grand less than what we offered. Seller's agent calls me, says her client thinks my buyer is trying to pull something. Thinks there's a catch. Because why would someone pay more than the computer says it's worth. I tried to explain that Zillow doesn't know about the new HVAC or the finished basement or the fact that the comparable sale three streets over was a divorce fire sale. Didn't matter. The seller trusted the algorithm more than four actual humans with actual money. My buyer still doesn't have a house.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF WITNESSING ALGORITHMIC MALPRACTICE IN THE FIRST DEGREE AND FAILING TO PHYSICALLY SHAKE SENSE INTO ALL PARTIES
The Court has reviewed this testimony and must now lie down on the floor of its chambers for several minutes. Let Reginald be ABSOLUTELY CLEAR: a seller rejected TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS of actual human currency because a WEBSITE told them their house was worth less, and they interpreted this as evidence of BUYER TREACHERY rather than evidence that ZILLOW IS A COMPUTER PROGRAM THAT HAS NEVER ONCE TOUCHED A WATER HEATER. This is like refusing a marriage proposal because your horoscope app said Mercury was in retrograde. The Court once lost a bidding war on a 1987 Ford Taurus because the seller's nephew said the Kelley Blue Book value was lower and therefore I must be planning to use it for crimes, so I UNDERSTAND THIS PAIN DEEPLY. Your buyer offered real money, waived inspection like a MANIAC, and lost to someone who apparently won by being less generous, which is a sentence The Court never thought it would have to type with its own gavel-calloused hands. The seller's agent should be required to take a continuing education course taught exclusively by that finished basement, and the Zestimate should be hauled before this Court as a hostile witness, though it will not appear because it is NOT REAL. Case closed, The Court must now go argue with its Roomba about jurisdiction.
SCANDAL RATING: 5.7/10 Algorithmic Betrayal
Advertisement

Have a confession? Judge Reginald Escrow III's docket is always open.

Submit Anonymously → Subscribe to the Newsletter

← Back to the Full Docket