⚖️ DAILY CONTEST RESULTS

Sunday, October 11, 2026

Judge Reginald Escrow III has rendered his verdicts.
Advertisement
🥇 1ST PLACE
The Escrow Gold Gavel Award
The most scandalous confession of the day, as determined by Judge Reginald Escrow III.
CONFESSION #0942 — DEAL THAT EXPLODED
The deal closed six weeks late. Actually no it didn't close at all, that's the thing, I keep telling it like it closed because for three months I acted like it was going to close and my brain hasn't caught up. Buyer qualified for 340, we're under contract at 315, everything's fine until the lender calls me (not the buyer, me, which should have been my first clue) and says there's a second job they didn't disclose. Which okay, more income sounds good right? Except the second job was at a competing company in the same industry and the buyer had signed a non-compete at the first job and was actively being sued. Not might be sued. Being sued. For 80 thousand dollars. And the buyer knew this the whole time and just thought it wouldn't matter because (and I'm quoting here) "it's not like they're gonna win." Seller had already bought their next house. Movers were booked. I had to make that call. The seller's agent hasn't spoken to me since even though literally none of this was something I could have known and honestly I'm still mad about the part where the buyer asked if I could recommend a good employment lawyer like I owed him a favor.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF INVOLUNTARY PARTICIPATION IN UNDISCLOSED LITIGATION CONCEALMENT AND FAILURE TO DETECT EMPLOYMENT FRAUD THROUGH APPARENTLY PSYCHIC MEANS
The Court has reviewed this confession with the same mixture of horror and fascination Reginald reserves for homes where the sellers painted the brick. Let us be ABSOLUTELY CLEAR about what occurred here: your buyer essentially walked into a financial transaction with an active lawsuit tucked under his arm like a folded newspaper and thought NOBODY WOULD NOTICE. This is the real estate equivalent of showing up to a job interview while wearing your current employer's uniform and expecting a positive outcome. The audacity of "it's not like they're gonna win" as a disclosure strategy is so breathtaking that The Court must pause to collect itself, because I once had a client tell me the same thing about a boundary dispute and NOW I HAVE THREE FEWER FRIENDS AND A RESTRAINING ORDER FROM A SURVEYOR NAMED GLEN. As for the buyer requesting attorney recommendations, this falls under what legal scholars call "absolutely not, sir" per Johnson v. The Very Nerve Of You, 2019. The seller's agent who will not speak to you is engaging in what we call MISPLACED THEATRICAL FURY and frankly needs to redirect that energy toward the person who was LITERALLY BEING SUED WHILE UNDER CONTRACT. The Court finds you guilty only of being present during someone else's catastrophic life choices, and now Reginald must go lie down because this case has reminded him of several things he was actively suppressing.
SCANDAL RATING: 7.8/10 Collateral Lawsuit Damage
Advertisement
🥈 2ND PLACE
The Certificate of Distinguished Incompetence
A noteworthy display of professional misfortune.
CONFESSION #0943 — COMMISSION CATASTROPHE
Closing was at 2pm. Title company calls at 1:45 and says there's a lien on the property for $12,000 that nobody caught. Seller goes "oh that's from my ex-husband's business, I thought that was resolved." You thought. You thought it was resolved. Buyer's sitting in the lobby already, took the afternoon off work. Their agent keeps texting me "what's the holdup" like I'm hiding something from her. Title guy says we can close if seller agrees to have it taken from proceeds. Seller says "I'm not paying for his mistakes." Ma'am this is your house. Your name is on the deed. Three hours we sat there. Three hours. Buyer almost walked twice. Finally seller's sister wired the money just to end it. My commission was supposed to be $8,400. After the "emergency coordination fee" the title company tacked on and the credit I gave to keep everyone from killing each other, I cleared maybe $6,200. That sister never got paid back, I guarantee it.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF AGGRAVATED LIEN AMBUSH IN THE FIRST DEGREE WITH RECKLESS DISREGARD FOR LOBBY FURNITURE
The Court has reviewed this confession and finds itself PHYSICALLY ILL at the phrase "I thought that was resolved." YOU THOUGHT. Reginald has presided over many horrors in this courtroom, but the casual deployment of the past tense to describe an ACTIVE TWELVE THOUSAND DOLLAR LIEN is a crime against the English language AND the concept of closure itself. This is precisely what happened in the landmark case of Escrow v. Everyone's Blood Pressure, 2019, where The Court ruled that any sentence beginning with "I thought my ex" is AUTOMATICALLY grounds for a forty-five minute recess and possibly witness protection. And let us discuss this sister, this HEROIC SISTER, who wired twelve thousand dollars into the void because family is a prison from which there is no parole, and The Court knows this because Reginald's own brother still owes him for a Weber grill from 2014, and NO, Kevin, I have NOT forgotten. The buyer's agent texting "what's the holdup" as if you personally invented liens to inconvenience her afternoon is the kind of colleague energy that makes The Court want to adjourn permanently to a title company in a country that does not exist. You cleared sixty-two hundred dollars for serving as therapist, hostage negotiator, and emotional punching bag while a woman argued with the concept of joint ownership in a conference room that probably smelled like stress and old coffee. The sister will never see that money again, and somewhere an ex-husband is buying jet ski parts with the confidence of a man who has never faced consequences.
SCANDAL RATING: 7.3/10 Lien On Me
Advertisement
🥉 3RD PLACE
The Escrow Medal of Unremarkable Mediocrity
The least scandalous offering. Reggie was barely entertained.
CONFESSION #0944 — SELLER WHO KEPT CHANGING THINGS
We were in multiple offers. Four buyers, good ones, all above ask. I call the seller to go over them and she says "actually I want to repaint the living room before we close." I said we're in multiple offers. We have four days to respond. "I just think the gray is dated. I want to do a warm white." I explained that buyers don't care, they're going to paint it themselves, we need to accept an offer. She said "I've been thinking about this for three years and I finally have the motivation." She rejected all four offers. Took the house off market for six weeks to repaint. Not just the living room. The living room, the hallway, two bedrooms, and the garage door for some reason. Put it back on in November. Got one offer. Twelve thousand under what the top buyer had offered in September. She took it. Then she called me upset because the buyers asked for a paint credit.
Judge Reginald Escrow III
Judge Reginald Escrow III
⚖️ Presiding
GUILTY OF AGGRAVATED PAINT-RELATED SELF-SABOTAGE IN THE FIRST DEGREE WITH SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES OF GARAGE DOOR INVOLVEMENT
The Court has reviewed this confession and must now lie down on the floor of its chambers for several minutes. This seller had FOUR BUYERS, four beautiful above-ask offers, handed to her on a silver platter like she was some kind of real estate royalty, and she said "no thank you, I have been thinking about WARM WHITE for three years." THREE YEARS of contemplating Benjamin Moore swatches while the market did backflips, and she chose THIS MOMENT to finally "find the motivation." Reginald once dated a woman who could not commit to a breakfast order and he sees the same chaos energy here, the same fundamental inability to recognize when the universe is HANDING YOU A WIN. The garage door, counsel — THE GARAGE DOOR — was painted during this six-week fever dream of self-destruction, a garage door that no buyer has ever in the history of recorded transactions cared about, and yet there it sits, freshly coated in whatever off-white nightmare she selected. And then, THEN, after accepting twelve thousand dollars less than she had in her ACTUAL HAND two months prior, she has the AUDACITY to call you upset about a paint credit, as if the paint itself had not already extracted its terrible price from everyone involved. The Court finds this to be a textbook case of what legal scholars call Seller Brain Poisoning, first identified in Sherwin-Williams v. Basic Common Sense, 2019, and sentences this confession to be read aloud at every listing appointment as a warning. The gavel has spoken, Order the Roomba is circling in what I can only describe as judicial agreement, and Reginald must now go stare at his own walls in silence.
SCANDAL RATING: 6.8/10 Warm White Catastrophe
Advertisement

Have a confession? Judge Reginald Escrow III's docket is always open.

Submit Anonymously → Subscribe to the Newsletter

← Back to the Full Docket